Best 120 film scanner reddit I got mine for $50 used with all the film holders etc. It’s also much easier to scan curly film with the Primefilm since it doesn’t use film holders. Currently trying camera scanning with Fuji X-H1 and adapted Tokina 100mm f/2. Fine for digital work but not great for printing. Comes with film negative holders. Personally, I think the best film scanner ever made (that wasn't a drum scanner) was the Nikon 9000. So $100 per roll of 120mm at 6x6 and $299 per 35mm roll . It does 35mm and 120 film (not sure which type of film you have) and I use it extensively for the 120 film i shoot regularly. 2900 dpi, usb, ICE and the auto film feeder system that I particularly like in my own coolscan. For absolute top-notch quality you're looking at the Flextight/Hasselblad or a drum scanner. Look for something used, the Canoscan film scanners have the correct transparency unit for medium format and the resolution is very acceptable for medium format. Epson flatbed scanners like the V550 and V600 usually don’t get much love, and they are quite bad for 35mm, but they do a decent job for 120. Thanks! Recently, I've upgraded to a 120 film camera and would like to scan 120 film without purchasing a dedicated 120 scanner, which is quite expensive. So get the ANR glass holders. Budget scanners are a lot slower than professional scanners. I shoot a lot of 120 so I have the Plustek 120 (which is stupidly expensive) but if the film holders for the 35mm Plustek are as good as they are for the 120, it will do a great job holding film flat/etc. They even have a medium format scanner but for 2000$ it likely is above your budget. They are also time consuming so if you shoot a lot you and you scan the whole film it's gonna take you some time compared to digital camera or other dedicated scanners. There is also the XES Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium Best 120 scanner on a budget The listing title is just "120 Format Film & Slide Scanner Film Size 6x4. And you can scan 2 frames of 120 film at a time. The Epson V series, particularly the V700 are probably the best short of going to something like a flextight or a drum scanner. The colors come out terrible. Best resolution, similar dynamic range to the best scanners and way faster. 120 film 6x7 : ~8400x7200pixels 120 film 6x9 : ~10800x7200pixels 4x5 sheet film: ~12000x15000pixels All resolutions accived are high enough for social media use of non cropped immages. They're good but maybe not the best choice. List of the Best Medium Format Film Scanners: Epson Perfection V600 – Best Overall Scanner for Medium Format Films; Epson Perfection V800 – Best 120 Film Scanner for Professional Use The EFH is alright for 35mm but ass for 120. they are the biggest hassle imo. The Plustek 35mm scanners are reasonably priced & give really good results. What really helped was getting a piece of acid-etched/non-glare glass from a frame shop at roughly 6 X 2. you should look around and mail your film to an online shop if there really isn't a place local It seems like this new scanner, the Plustek OpticFilm 120 Pro, came out last year then mysteriously disappeared. I own a v700 and although it is good for 120 film, I gave up on scanning 35mm with it. DSLR scanning is by far the most cost-effective solution for high-quality digitization of 120 film. ' From a lot of film scanning experience, throughput is very important. The full size models for small format up to 4x5" (X1/646, X5/949, 848) go for $6,000-$18,000, but there are the little ones like the 343 that are still great, don't do 4x5" (unless you scan in sections) and can go for around $2000 sometimes including an old Mac computer to run Flexcolor on. I hated those fiddly epson holders. I need something that can scan 120, 620, 35mm and probably a lot of other film sizes. If you are only scanning 35mm film, there are dedicated 35mm film scanners that may perform somewhat better than the flatbed. The film will sag under its own weight. I’m getting pretty good scans off of mine for 120. Epson perfection scanners upwards from the V550 come with holders for both 35mm and 120 film (there's also one for 35mm slides if you need that too) so you can basically scan any common film size. You have to manually advance the film in to the scanner so it can be a little time-consuming. If its reliable as their 8200 scanner then its a no brainer. The Nikon Coolscan 8000/9000 in particular supports 120 film. It has auto advance so it can batch scan a complete roll and according to this review Link which is of the same model scanner, but under a different brand name, it is capable of ~4300dpi of optical resolution or around 25MP. If you buy an inexpensie Plustek scanner, you can get decent quality, but reviews say the best quality takes up to 20 minutes per 35mm frame. you want very high quality even if this means slow scanning -> Plustek Opticfilm - manual film feed, very slow workflow, extremely high dpi for this price, smaller but without possibility to scan 120. I use film scanners but except for my Plustek OpticFilm 135 which scans my Xpan films with a panoramic holder (which is a separate purchase, I had to call them and order it over the phone) they are quite old and either are no longer made and/or have to use firewire. Unless you're sure that you won't go into medium format I'd not buy one of the cheap 35mm scanners. A roll of 120 film costs between 8 and 20 EUR/USD, a 120 camera costs several hundred up to several thousand EUR/USD. I think there is only one new model for 120 film. As far as dedicated scanners go the flat bed scanners seem to have the best quality to cost ratio. Unless you own all the pieces, I really doubt the hassle is worth it. If so, could someone point me in that direction. Best bang for the buck is definitely the v600/700/800 I would at least go with the v700 so you can scan film bigger than 120 in the future. Still fine for sharing on the internet though and making 10x8 prints. 5MM scanner and a $1MM film recorder being added at the lab along with the computers to run it in the days before Photoshop existed. Plustek pulled their new 120 Pro off the market due to hardware and firmware issues. They're only available used anymore and Nikon hasn't updated the software in about a decade (though you can get VueScan to run them). Betterscanning holder seems to be the best solution out there but they seemed out of business, so I have a Digitaliza holder and some foam for the right height. Print size for max sharpness: 110 film : ~10x13cm half frame : ~18x14cm 35mm film : ~18x28cm 120 film 4,5x6: ~36x48cm 120 film 6x6 : ~48x48cm 120 film 6x7 The other thing with flatbed scanners is that if you have to scan at some ridiculous resolution like 6400dpi to get the best results and then resize after the facts. Dec 11, 2024 · Using the best film scanner is the quickest and easiest way to digitize your film photos. But if you're willing to deal with old hardware, you can order a refurbished high-end flatbed like Creo Eversmart Supreme from this place . I've been trying to gauge reviews from online and reddit about a suitable 35mm film scanner. Whole roll batch scanning is a bit of a gimmick - there is frame drift here and there so you have to be there to supervise which defeats the purpose. For 35mm I would go with a Nikon dedicated scanner, the v850 will still be a disappointment I have a plustek 7200. I'm a hobby photographer, so I don't need something crazy expensive like a Noritsu, but also want something that's not a cheap entry level scanner. This is mainly because the scan was only 6MP (because high quality was only with a high premium). Scanning is a can of worms, and, everyone will have an opinion. I'm thinking that really I would just need to get a larger light source to put overtop the scanner bed to trick it into scanning the larger area. You can only use CyberViewX which is horrible. Drum Scanners. I've owned Plustek 8200i and it gives you results far more superior, than any flatbed (especially V600 that I also have). I have the format mask but it doesn't make a difference. It is worth only around 15 rolls of film. You might have a dusty archive of old film negatives you want to reorganize digitally. Reddit's most popular camera brand-specific subreddit! We are an unofficial community of users of the Sony Alpha brand and related gear: Sony E Mount, Sony A Mount, legacy Minolta cameras, RX cameras, lenses, flashes, photoshare, and discussion. that said you already know how much film costs to get developed and scanned per roll so thats an investment that will pay for itself. 8 macro lens, using Epson film holders with ANR glass inserts and a Kaiser Slimlite LED light panel. And also the reflecta series of scanners which are OEMed from Pacific Image. (This two are different from other Plustek in that they have automatic film tray scanning vs manually pushing the film tray to scan one picture at a time). The infrared dust removal doesn't work very well either. I’m curious to develop and scan myself. -Crealty CR-1 -iPhone X to 14 (It must have face ID) Mar 18, 2013 · Lomography’s new film scanner is a brilliant device specifically designed for quick scanning of 35mm film. Nov 27, 2024 · Our experts pick the best film scanners that make it easier than ever to bring your old 35mm negatives and slides into the digital age Thank you for your interest in the OptifFilm 120 Pro scanner. Since you requested to be on the waiting list, we are sending you the following offer You have until 3/8/22 at 12 pm PST to return the attached Your options really depend on budget. They also run in the tens of thousands of dollars. It has Digital ICE, which works pretty well. Even an old DSLR with crop sensor and a vintage macro lens get you great results. If you thought an at home film strip scanner was slow, flatbeds are even slower. I use Negative Lab Pro and am really happy with the colors I’m getting from my scans. Probably for a little more money you could get something like an Epson V700 or V750 or for about 700-800 a used V800. I shot that much film over my last 10 days of vacation. I reckon 135 and 120 A dedicated 35mm scanner will limit you to that medium. Ask anything about analog photography in our weekly "ask anything" thread, or share photos. A flatbed scanner will do 35mm & 120, but they're not always the sharpest, especially for 35mm. I'm looking to buy a 3d scanner for scanning dashboards of cars (Black surfaces and sometimes reflective, not exactly good for even pro scanners, without preparing it's surface). In my local market, Chile, I only have three options. (Minolta 5400 for 35mm, Minolta Multipro and Microtek Artixscan 120TF for 120). I think your best bet would probably be DSLR scanning. The V550 looks like a clear winner here to me, at least according to these comparisons. The Plustek OpticFilm 120 Film Scanner is a full-featured scanner that is especially great with 120 film formats. I don't have a DSLR to do those types of scans, either. I was finding some film was extra curly and difficult to lay flat, so decided to invest in the 120 mask as i saw a reasonable deal for one along with an extra 135 holder on eBay. I'm so eager to have a more modern film scanner. A long time ago I made multi-pass scans of 120 positive film (16 passes) and I'm trying to find a software with equivalent capacities (for cheap !) Reply reply UsbyCJThape Nikon and Minolta scanners are best, but they're quite rare, old and damn expensive. Here are my options (all are used+tested): 1) Plustek OpticFilm 7600ii 35 mm - $195. My question is; what are the best scanners for a beginner that both scan 35mm and 120mm? I'd disagree on the Pakon being the best option for 35mm. With flatbed scanners the quality will never be super-amazing. Have a look at the Negative Lab Pro Facebook group and the Digitising film with a digital camera group. If you’re on more of a budget, the Plustek 120 is a fine scanner. The setup is temperamental and there's not a lot of 'flex. Of course, the down side is that it's an eighteen year old scanner that Nikon stopped supporting back in 2007. Either Epson V600 or V850. They are pretty hard to handle, difficult to store, the etched surface scratches and collects dust particles, and the film strips are hard to get at exactly 90 degrees. Oct 16, 2018 · Shop B&H Photo for film scanners Find an Plustek OpticFilm 120 on eBay Shop eBay for film scanners Follow Casual Photophile on Facebook and Instagram [Some of the links in this article will direct users to our affiliates at B&H Photo, Amazon, and eBay. There is also the coolscan IV. Other examples are: Minolta Dimage Scan Multi, Nikon Coolscan 8000/9000, Polaroid Sprintscan 120, Hasselblad Flextight, Noritsu HS-1800, Fuji Frontier SP-3000, all drum scanners,… No DSLR setup trumps a dedicated film scanner, such a those indicated by OP, and that is by design. Thank you all for your time and effort. I’ve purchased all I need to develop the films but am now looking into scanners. I just need a scanner now. i personally cant stand flatbed scanners like the Epson V series. For quality I don't think there's something better than those for consumer-friendly scanning. I don’t think there is anything brand new available. Thinking of getting it from ebay. We are pleased to announce the availability of a limited number of OpticFilm 120 Pro scanners. I don’t mind a dedicated 35mm scanner. Thanks! Hello all, I am looking for a good film scanner, but one that is basic. Feb 22, 2020 · In this article, I’ll list the best medium format film scanners that you can use to turn your analog photographs into digital memories. So I though to get a "cheap" scanner myself. . Vuescan is a third party software that supports pretty much any scanner you'd find, regardless if the manufacturer has stopped making d I recently received the scan from my first role of film from a local film lab and was not very happy with the quality. Even a used APS-C camera that is 18-24MP and a reasonable macro lens, copy stand, film holder and light source will likely cost less than a v850 Pro. CT scanners have been in use for a long time for checked luggage and historically not used at all for carry-on luggage. And the Plustek is much better with 35mm film Hi, apologies if this is a question already posed. Hey just wanted to put this out there in case it's useful for anyone, I needed a film holder for my Epson V600 and I was annoyed that it cost $18 and it's an extremely flimsy piece of plastic that doesn't hold the film very flat. I was mentioning my satisfaction with the 120 because Plustek has 35mm only scanners in the <$400 range new and much less on ebay, and if the quality of the 120 holds for the 8100/8200 series then it might be a good choice. It's not amazing, but gives decent results for medium format. The 300 USD scanner you named as an example of not really cheap anymore actually is REALLY cheap in the medium format world. If not, I've seen that Epsom seem to be good for 120/220 film but this seems to not be the case for 35mm film. Interesting. Note also that the Nikon and the Minolta are actually meant to be medium format scanners, while the Dainippon was made with large format in mind. Is there a scanner that can do that? Thanks so much CT scanners will trash film. For discussion of how to shoot film, buying advice, or what went wrong on your first roll head on over to /r/analogcommunity. The scanner includes the LaserSoft Imaging SilverFast Ai to further enhance your photo scans. I have a Kodak 35mm scanner that’s pretty cool, and I’m wondering if anyone has suggestions on user-friendly negative scanners. 2) Pacific Image PrimeFilm XA 35mm - $450 Has anyone ever tried to scan 120 film on an epson v370? I know the LED bar is meant for 35mm film so when I tried to fix it up with a custom made holder, it only scanned a 35mm strip. V600 for a budget option. The interpolating Bayer or Xtrans sensor in a DSLR ALWAYS yields inferior colour and spatial resolution than a non interpolating line sensor in dedicated film scanner. IMO the best upgrade is a better camera+lens, but if you insist on the scanner route, there aren't any currently manufactured scanners that can approach the best cameras in quality. 4in so that it fit in the 120 film tray. Thanks for your help! Overall it seems to be fine for 35mm scanning but would not recommend it for 120 film. But when I got ahold of a V850, I did some test scans and the included Epson holders** were noticeably sharper than the Digitaliza, so i stopped using it. I personally didn't like the quality of a flatbed, and it took up way more space than the dedicated 35mm scanner, but if you want to scan your own 120, it would be your best option. But great. Also the edges are not tapered and can cause reflections on the film. My question is: is it possible to scan film with other (cheaper) scanners (like a canon canoscan lide 400)? There are many other flatbed scanners, there are pro film scanners and there’s the whole world of camera scans (if you have a decent digital camera already). The 8800f isn't bad, especially when compared with scanners of a similar vintage. If you have a garbage bag full of money just laying around, the Hasselblad Flextite X-series of scanners are some of the best you’ll ever get. The V500 really does an OK job with 120 film, but scanning 35mm with it is just impossible due to the bad film holder (which could be replaced by a Better Scanning holder for better results). For those of you who share my love for medium format, let me show an easy way to use the film scanner for 120 film scanning. After five minutes of restarting the scanner, restarting the calibration tool, making sure I had the latest version of everything, etc. Thoughts? I have the V500 and the scan quality for 120 film is quite good; 35mm is OK(it could be a bit sharper). Also I'm open to suggestions on ways for me to scan my 120 film, specifically 645. I'm thinking my issues may be due to my frames being 645 format. The software has a mild learning curve, but it’s not super difficult. For sheet film, the v850 stomps the dslr hands down in resolution, but is still slow. Note: the 35mm scans are from expired CVS film from the mid 2000's if the colors seem off. However, starting about five years ago, CT scanners are being deployed to security checkpoints to screen carry on luggage. The epson v600 is a great scanner for $200-ish. I looked around online, and i found there are 3 main scenarios (epson v600 or something similar/dedicated film scanners/using DSLR camera). And it can also scan 120 films. Dedicated 120 capable film scanners tend start above $1000 new. Just picked up the Epson V550 to start scanning in my 120 B&W film. Dedicated scanners that do both 35mm and 120 film are so expensive, that it's much cheaper to buy a dedicated 35mm scanner and a flatbed. But if its what you have then its all you can do. Buy a nicer flatbed scanner that has a film scanner. Plustek 120 is definitely not the only scanner that can do both 135 and 120. After dicking around with scanning 35mm, scanning 120 is so much easier to deal with, and the images are much more pleasing. In general, if cost is no object, dedicated scanners are the best way to produce high-quality scans at home. As everyone else has said, that won't work. my favorite scanner ever is the Pakon f135. The film holder for 120 film can fit strips up-to about 20 cm length, but the scan windows is only large enough to scan 2x 6x6 frames. I'll put a couple 35mm scans at the bottom. The scanner is very slow ( and I usually scan on an Epson V850 ). Does it mean that epson is better? What's the point? What scanner is the best under 500$? Im shooting 135, 120 rarely Hey there! I’ve recently ventured from shooting film on a 35 mm on an old DSLR camera to purchasing my first medium format camera. Hi, I’m setting up my own dev + scan workstation. This would be a good budget option. these can get spendy and sometimes require weird software. You'd be looking at spending over a grand for something like a Nikon LS 9000 that was discontinued over a decade ago and therefore can be tricky to get to work with modern operating systems. The supplied software is basic, but works fine. I’d spend the money getting the method that is best for the format you most often shoot. It does not hold the film flat enough because how could it when you can slide the film through it. 5cm/6x6cm/6x7cm Film Scanner recs for 120 Hey there! I'm thinking of getting a scanner, I primarily shoot 120, mostly bw, mostly 100 ISO, so I was considering an epson flatbed, maybe the v600, but I've been seeing some mixed reviews. , I was about to give up on the scanner for the day and quit SilverFast, which I still had open in the background. Is the reason because of the trays or smoother reason? Any help is greatly appreciated. It's not possible to place an order, even a backorder, for it. I have 4x 120mm and 1x 35mm rolls to develop and scan at a lab, I have the option of 3 different scanners: Noritsu HS1800 Frontier (No model given by lab) Imacon Flextight X5 Obviously the Flextight is the best option here but my lab wants to charge me $8. If you can dedicate a computer to the scanner, a used Flextight does a god job. To answer your Q, if you scan only 120 then I think the v600 should be enough. They cut it from a scrap piece and gave it to me for free. I shoot with a Mamiya 645j and I get my film developed somewhat locally, but I am planning on starting an at-home darkroom. I received the scanner today and the experience has not been favorable. Scale the V550 scan in the first image to fit the camera shot (~75%), overlay them, apply adjustments to the V550's image to loosely match the camera scan's contrast, and you can see the Budweiser sign, the ceiling vent, and all the fine details in general are visibly sharper in the V550 scan. If you only shoot 35mm there are plusteks in your price range that might work. One complaint is the holder, which is a real pain in the ass to use, especially if your film is not perfectly flat. I shoot 35mm (mostly) and 120 film. The IV is less interesting because it doesn't have the anti dust system which is the last stronghold of film scanners compared to dslr scanning. Getting meh for 35mm (but my wife shoots 35mm, not me). First the lens calibration tool refused to acknowledge that there was a film holder in the scanner. We need a 120 linear scanner on the market for sometime outside of taking the risks of buying a Coolscan 8000/9000. Best of Reddit; Topics; when I use the cheap aldi slide/film scanner at home the quality is a lot worse, and the color is very different. I don’t intend to use it too professionally, just to scan film I don’t want to pay to get scanned. V600 is capable of about 1560 dpi optically, which means you get about 11MP out of a 6x6 neg. You cannot do batch scanning of a 35 mm film strip. So I designed this one that can be 3D printed. By purchasing anything using these links, Casual Photophile may receive a small commission at Check the condition of the film and make sure you use a reputable service. you might have some luck with a DLSR / Mirrorless + Negative Lab Pro (Lightroom plugin that really does wonders to scans) but your best bet is going to be a film dedicated / designed scanner. Lets hope that they've ironed out issues that I've read with the old 120 models like the intermittent banding and communication stuff. Plusteks can be very cheap, and up to 5 times sharper than flatbeds. I've had mixed results with mine- the film tends to bow and isn't held flat enough for my liking with the 120 holder, leading me to purchase the new version of the Digitaliza 120, which I'm testing out tonight. In 2021, someone managed to achieve this conversion, but most of the software information provided back then is now outdated. Or maybe you're riding the wave of popularity of film photography. Buy a decent dedicated film scanner like a Nikon Coolscan 5000 or 9000. Expensive. In the end, I stuck with Epson because of the convenience and the fact that they are great for medium format. Another thing I noticed is that max resolution for 120 film is lower than for 35mm. I wonder why is that? This is probably the best scanner available under ~$3000 provided you only want to scan 35mm Link. YMMV (** They have adjustable height and sandwich the film against a transparent plastic backing) TL;DR: advice needed! budget scanner around 200 eur for 35mm film for an amateur photographer hi reddit! I’ve only just started taking pictures on film (about 4 films in) but I’m already noticing how expensive scanning gets in my area (Hamburg, Germany). I get darkroom printing, I was a custom color printer for over a decade before digital, and remember the transition with a $1. I've seen good reviews for the Kodak Slide N Scan and it sounds like it's relatively easy to use. For that price range, you are looking at mostly flatbed scanners unless you come across a good used deal. I found the Digitaliza 120 holder to be better than the ones included with the Epson V500. Hey! I was wondering to start scanning my film negatives at home. Should we consider investing in Epson Perfection V850 Pro scanner or Nikon CoolScan V? This collection is priceless and I want to make sure we get the best possible images before the slides deteriorate or are thrown out. It can be a bit tricky to get up and running. The Plustek scanners seem to do a decent job. Most dedicated film scanners are limited to smaller films sizes. It features great hardware and excellent quality results. Otherwise, I'm reasonably happy with what I'm getting from the scanner with the standard software followed by some tweaks in lightroom. Do you have any opinion on the KODAK Slide N SCAN? Film photography subreddit. The guy in my lab tells me 24MP or 12MP scanning is only a few seconds difference for him, all the works goes into cleaning the negative. Print size for max sharpness: 110 film : ~10x13cm half frame : ~18x14cm 35mm film : ~18x28cm 120 film 4,5x6: ~36x48cm 120 film 6x6 : ~48x48cm 120 film 6x7 Posted by u/thedub2 - 1 vote and 2 comments Note that the first three scanners are conventional film scanners, while the Dainippon is actually a consumer drum scanner. My question is: Does anyone have an recommendations as to their preferred settings for scanning and importing? Loving the scanner so far but wanted to hear from some others who have scanned with it to make sure I'm getting the best imports. Is there anything modern that is comparable in quality and resolution (X5 is up to 8000dpi). They move the film holder to gain accurate focus. But it is 10% price of the Betterscanning ones, and one pair of glass fits all possible film sizes from 110 to 4x5. Flatbeds have some ridiculous claims about resolutions but none of that matters if your film isn’t in focus. I saw Hasselblad X1/X5 (Imacon) were one of the best before, but they use outdated interfaces and still cost a lot on eBay. All I will do is scan for myself and not after reading each replay I've got to the conclusion: Aug 24, 2021 · Plustek OpticFilm 120 Pro is a very good scanner. I know that its too much for home, but, price for processing 1 shot on noritsu is cheaper than on epson V750. Therefore, scanning will take much longer due to the required manual interactions. I'm hoping they bring it back. I’d say 3200 dpi is great, I use 4000 dpi, it is right there in the limits of film resolution. 30 per image. Older model I got used for cheap, but all the plustek 35mm scanners give great quality. I own both the V500 and Plustek 7500 (which is an older model) and shoot a lot of both 35mm and 120 film. Drum scanners are the gold standard for film scanning, and are capable of capturing incredibly detailed images. Since hardly anybody can afford most of those, the next step down would be the Nikon 9000 or Minolta Multi Pro. One thing you could try with your v600 is to buy a different film holder, one with adjustable height feet, or to purchase ANR glass inserts for your stock Epson film holders to really keep the film flat during scanning. Hope this helps someone in the future Unfortunately dedicated film scanners that also do 120 are Not Cheap. X-ray scanners will not. don't go to walgreens, they don't do same day developing and they don't return your negatives, they give you their scans printed on 4 x 6 photo paper but their scanners are pretty shitty. It says out of stock on the Plustek website. Scanners that you can still buy new include the Plustek Opticfilm 135 and Plustek Opticfilm 120. My biggest issue with it is the lack of scanner software compatibility. The step up from that would be the Plustek 120 but that’s expensive AF. The glass plate film holder is perfect for almost any film format you can throw at it. thanks! Usually answerit depends. And that is only for starters. But they have some cheaper ones. Sadly there are no currently available 120 film scanners that seem reliable. I'm using a Plustek for 35mm and a V700 for everything else. There are reasonable scanners that will get ~14 mpix of detail out of a 35mm neg for ~$300 (plustek opticfilm 7600 / 8200). And of course there is the DIY solution - backlight and DSLR with macro lens. But in my local lab they have noritsu hs1800. And the Pacific Image 120 Pro is a crapshoot, every review I've seen mentions that they either were dead out of the box, or developed horrible banding issues within a few months. It can be found sometimes around the €250 mark or even below. The same holds true for the 120 film holder (no auto transport). Of course, for 120 flatbed is an option since medium format scanners are incredibly expensive (look for Nikon 7000 or even Plustek 120). Among used gear the best option are drum scanners. Oct 8, 2020 · Looking for recommendations for a good film scanner for medium format negs/slides - I use a Nikon supercool scan 5000 for 35mm, recently returned to 6x6 and need a scanner. As long as you don't need scans within like 10 minutes, either a Nikon or a Pacific image will net higher resolution results, and have better DMAX, and a Pacific image XAs is cheaper, brand new, than any Pakon is these days. I have a v600 and I am kinda regretting not going the extra mile. They will destroy film. You can look at buying a used Imacon Flextight. Some pages on internet recommend plustek 8200 or epson V750+. I use an Epson v550 flatbed for 120 film, but I am trying to improve my camera scanning technique to get better results than the Epson in the same amount of time or less. There is a famous lab scanner that I could recommend that works great with windows 10, scans 35mm and 120 in minutes with great colors and resolution but you'd be looking at around 15 grand. tyhr pwf sdpdabd xdns iavpl bvyjc pbw frykl ktgbgc ycfb