Awaiting reviewer selection desk reject reddit. One should cite papers, not journals.

Awaiting reviewer selection desk reject reddit The review consisted of the following sentence: It was clearly communicated what phase 1 entails. , if one of the original reviewers was generally happy with your revisions and recommended acceptance (or minor revisions), but the other reviewer was not satisfied and recommended rejection. Noww based on the seats they have after people declare their decision, you will be considered Jul 24, 2018 · However, in your case, since the paper was not assigned to an Associate Editor, I feel inclined to think that the "Under Review" status refers to the initial editorial review, not peer review. Oct 3, 2024 · Understanding Desk Rejection. If it does not suit the journal, it will be rejected without review to begin with (desk rejection). Other journals will likely desk reject it because it’s out of their scope. May 27, 2020 · I received a mail about five hours after submission stating: It is a pleasure to inform you that your manuscript titled XYZ has passed initial screening and is now awaiting reviewer selection. To give you context the path for this paper was Reject and Resubmit -> Reject and Resubmit -> Reject -> Major Revisions -> Minor Revision (15 months after first submission). the editor of the first journal consulted with the editor of the second and in their response letter they said if we transferred it would go out immediately for review. In case ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ happened earlier, they initially decided to send it for review, but changed their mind, and decided to Unfortunately, the review process has been incredibly frustrating. They will then put it back into "Awaiting Review" status so you can return it. I went through a peer review process lasting more than one and a half years, crazy! I published two articles meanwhile. So, OP sends a paper to the journal. g. A desk reject response in 2022 was sent on average within 13 days. So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. I also tell them that they are forbidden to add more authors or change the order of authors once the manuscript goes to peer review. A good example of why a paper might not get desk rejection but still not be publishable is the following. Awaiting Editor Decision Yup, agree. Researchers also message participants via the internal messaging system, so as long as you check your messages you will see when/ if a rejection has been given to one of your submissions. I received more than five desk rejections, I don’t remember the count. 5. I am guessing desk rejects regarding formatting rule breaks etc. So I thought it passed the associate editor's evaluation and now they were looking for reviewers. It never hurts to ask. This change has occurred Nov 5, 2019 · However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. I submitted a paper, and got an immediate desk reject as “out of scope”. Also you have to assume people have been off for the holiday. However, I just noticed that the status of my revised manuscript Mar 13, 2022 · I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again No. Sometimes the handling administrator or editor are on holiday or busy. In the prior year, about 30% of the papers were on one of JOINs or TIME SERIES or GPUs. I am afraid that after this long period, the editor will reject the manuscript. It happens and editors are absolutely human. Yesterday we received a desk rejection notice from NeurIPS because our paper is several lines over the 8-page limit. This work means the world to my team. Has anyone had any experience with this? Am i getting a desk reject? Google search didn't help much. Is this normal? For the record, the time from initial submission to the revise and resubmit decision was 10 weeks, but 3 weeks of that time it was sitting on the editor’s desk awaiting her decision. If the two reviews are insubstantial, highly conflicting or raise any cause for concern, a further review should be sought. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. A manuscript typically gets a desk review by the Editor-in-Chief. R: Responses on the format evaluation are sent to the authors in up to two business days. Because ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ means that the manuscript passed the admin and/or Associate Editor (AE) check and was awaiting peer review. Feb 14, 2023 · Is it possible to get a desk reject after the "awaiting reviewer selection" stage? Clearly it is, as your example illustrates. Get what you can out of the reviewer comments and submit to the next journal - perhaps you need to explain the motivation a bit better. Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Don't worry, rejection is part of the process. That being said, they’ve probably done an initial review and didn’t flat out reject it, so that is a good thing! Jul 18, 2019 · I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. Like everyone said, rejection is the norm and you should just submit it to another journal. It was NOT desk rejected. e. Can I resubmit to Nature with a cover letter indicating this manuscript was sent for review in Science and got 1 postive and 1 negative comments? Nov 19, 2020 · I submitted an article to a ScholarOne journal. But how does the editor actually take the decision on a manuscript? This article explains the sequence of events that lead from peer review to editorial decision making: how the AE procures the completed reviews, assesses them, and finally comes to a decision on whether to accept the manuscript, request . However, the paper was on doing JOINs with TIME SERIES with GPUs. ACM permits both desk (or bench) rejects and "assisted” desk rejects. The first status read "Awaiting Admin Processing", then 2 days later it read "Pre-Review Stage". a rejection notice may take longer than an offer. Last week I sent a gentle reminder to the editor and got no response. It is a good social science journal, and I would love to publish there, but I have always had doubts as to whether my article truly "fits," and honestly, I just want to know if it is a desk reject or not. Now the status is awaiting DE decision. Also, I always write my reviews in a text document, then copy/paste them when I am ready to submit the review. May 6, 2021 · Either the desk editor (i. you may have also been the first person to interview and the other candidates will take a week or more to complete their final interviews. The editor decided to reject the manuscript. More specifically, though: You are looking for all sorts of formal reasons why the paper might have been rejected, or maybe why they wrongly rejected it. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was deemed good to go for peer review, the journal is finding it somewhat challenging to identify the right peer reviewers for your paper. I just had a paper transferred after a desk reject to a sister journal. This subreddit is for anyone who is going through the process of getting into graduate school, and for those who've been there and have advice to give. I know that the desk reject process at Nature-branded journals is a bit more complex than moving a paper from the inbox to the circular file; there is a requirement that all papers are read fully and that decisions (including desk rejections) are reported to the editorial board. Recommendation can also be "get reviewer to clarify" so it goes back to the review cycle. Just need someone to explain where a past work's existence justifies why mine is not novel. 7 weeks, unless no peer review is happening. Maybe. 225K subscribers in the gradadmissions community. The editor is roughly familiar with your field, but not enough to know whether (a) you're just reinventing the wheel, or (b) you are interpreting your sources accurately. Do I just keep waiting, send another email? What should I do with this frustrating It means nothing. Posted by u/Mountain-Ad-4557 - 17 votes and 29 comments Oct 14, 2023 · They get way more paper submissions than they can publish and OPs paper didn't look outstanding to the editor. At the same time, badly written papers are low-effort for the reviewer. I can't see any scenario in which the average time to acceptance is 1. Felt like maybe I wasn’t cut out for this. I've also had editors desk reject because they didn't understand the fit between my paper and the scope of the journal, and have had to appeal that. At first, the status showed "awaiting AE recommendation". Only participants and Prolific can Return a submission and participants can only return a submission if it is still "Awaiting Review" (or if they haven't submitted the study). While I am appreciative that the review time was relatively short (~30 days), I suspect that this may indicate a desk-rejection is imminent. Jul 4, 2020 · I submitted my manuscript five weeks ago, and in a week, the status appeared as 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection. But the decision is actually made already. So, please give me advice. Has anyone had this experience Most common form of rejection I've had is editors not feeling the paper is a good fit (basically journals with high impact factor who only want the sexiest stuff). ” Why has nothing been done with it? In some cases, ScholarOne will show that status even if a manuscript is under review. Your paper will now be sent for referee selection. Post any questions you have, there are lots of redditors with admissions knowledge waiting to help. Relatedly, does under review mean that the AE has sent to referees or just that AE has been assigned? As I recall, it switches to showing Awaiting reviewer scores, the. If the paper is really as badly written as you are saying, then most likely I would spend less than an hour in the review and reject it. After that, it changed to Awaiting Referee Selection once again. 7 weeks. I think two weeks later the status changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment" then today it changed to "awaiting ED decision". Does it mean the paper has been sent for peer review or is it still eligible for desk rejection? Please advise. I suppose that in most cases of minor revision, the revised manuscript will only be reviewed by the ADM or associate editor. Typically I've found success with that. Rejected after first round of review? A summary of the key reviewer points in which the rejection is based (usually accompanied by a generic letter appreciating your work, hope you submit in the future, etc. What do I do at this point? Do I write an email to the editor? What would I even say? I hate that my article is just “stuck” like this, when I could be working on submitting it somewhere else. Assisted desk rejects are rejections based on the judgment of the EiC or an AE that a paper is either out of scope or so far from acceptable as to make external reviews unnecessary. Nature (reject w/out review) Science (reject w/out review) Nature Electronics (reject w/out review) Nature Communications (passed editor, strong rejection by reviewers) Nature Nanotechnology (passed editor, mild rejection by reviewers) Nature (reject w/out review) Science (reject w/out review) Nature Nanotechnology (awaiting results) Received this email for NIPS 2020 rejection and the reason for rejection is - 1. This submission is summarily rejected because: - The paper is not formatted according to the NeurIPS requirements or it is not sufficiently anonymized. Then I submitted it to Science, it was rejected after the 1st round review, - 1 postive, 1 extremely negative. . It will take you to a new tab with your review in it and you can edit it there. Nov 30, 2020 · The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. Set and forget until it comes back. I submitted my paper to an Elsevier journal. I wouldn’t say the reviewer was very negative, and I think I could address the concerns. I don’t want to re-submit, but I thought it’s not fair to reject based on one referee. Although in my earlier submission of other papers in the same journal, in this time frame, my paper went into review process. 5 years old, three months past “required reviews completed”, and another that’s still “awaiting editor selection” despite having been reviewed, resubmitted with revisions, etc. Desk rejection occurs when an editor returns a manuscript to the author without sending it for peer review. It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Perhaps, if this continues for some time without changing, you may want to consider writing to the journal editor seeking clarity. awaiting AE decision, then Awaiting DE decision. The researcher is doing what Prolific advises, to ask participants to Return their Submissions rather than give a rejection, so whatever you did must not have been bad enough for a rejection! Prolific also suggests Partial Payments, usually if there was a technical problem on the researcher's end, so maybe that is what happened and is why they Oct 24, 2018 · I just submitted a revised paper to ScholarOne (major revision). It is slightly strange that the status changed to “awaiting Ed decision” in a week’s time. You must write back to ensure it gets a proper review and you receive a detailed review report. I know others who have had similarly difficult experiences before peer review at eLife. Read a quite a few stories ranging all the way from no rejection to 13 rejections (and ending up in IF greater than the first). Awaiting reviewer selection EMERALD. I had a manuscript submitted to Nature, and desk-rejected. I submitted a manuscript in late August, and the article's status hasn't changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" in the last four… If it's in awaiting review that means they are looking at your profile. Building an effective reviewer database. For an article that is going through the double blind review, we estimate a period of three months for the reports to be sent to the author(s). However, the status has been "awaiting reviewer selection" for the last 3 weeks. It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. Just got my first paper accepted with minor revision this week. I submitted a manuscript 3 days ago to a reputed journal. On the last step I’ve seen it stay for months because some DEs are sitting on the paper. Related reading: my paper went from "under review" to awaiting EIC decision after about 5 and a half weeks. I was disappointed but I kept submitting. Just keep slogging and going down the list of journals until it is taken. But honestly, the editor seems pretty nice to offer some specific comments on why the paper was desk rejected. It occurs even before the peer review of the submitted manuscript begins. You get two reviews. I have previously published in the same journal and it had taken 5 months to complete the first round. Desk-rejection (DR) is an important issue for all, authors and editors alike. If a submission is rejected, the researcher can set it back to Awaiting Review and the participant can then Return it. I have one right now that’s 1. uk has a great post or two about why review can take so long I'm sorry you had a rough outright rejection from eLife. Usually, those papers seem to be unanimously rejected, and for most part are low-effort for the reviewers. Wᴇʟᴄᴏᴍᴇ ᴛᴏ ʀ/SGExᴀᴍs – the largest community on reddit discussing education and student life in Singapore! SGExams is also more than a subreddit - we're a registered nonprofit that organises initiatives supporting students' academics, career guidance, mental health and holistic development, such as webinars and mentorship programmes. In brief. Like, my preprint gets a lot of attention but the submission was desk rejected for the third time today for the same reason, "lack of novelty. Rejection after peer review is based on whether your work is robust enough - in the view of the reviewers. Mar 15, 2016 · Once a paper is submitted to a journal, authors eagerly wait for the editorial decision. I just finished the revision. The formula to use is: Add the number of "Submissions Approved" plus the number of "Rejections" you have received to get a "total number". To maintain an effective Sage Track database of active reviewers we recommend that you: Dec 29, 2024 · 投了一个半月了，状态一直在awaiting reviewer selection 和 awaiting reviewer assignment之间变化，来回首页论文范文毕业论文论文发表论文格式期刊论文大全期刊问答问答百科期刊大全最新期刊论文问答杂志问答 Dealing with my first rejection right now; the file uploader within a survey timed out and auto-refreshed. ’ But this could be because the associate editor (AE) may have had a challenge finding reviewers for your manuscript. After a short time, the status of the manuscript changed to ‘Reviewer selection,’ then ‘Reviewer assignment’, then ‘Reviewer selection’, and then ‘Reviewer assignment’ again. ). This usually happens quickly after submission, allowing authors to redirect their work promptly. After 3 days, it shows "ADM Office: Awaiting Recommendation". Dec 12, 2019 · I submitted my manuscript to a journal. Reply reply FeelingAdept4723 We've not-so-recently submitted a manuscript to PNAS, which, after passing quality checks, has remained at the 'Under Editorial Board Review' stage for 33 days now. Should I Jul 31, 2021 · Hello, I submitted my paper to one of the high impact factor journals month ago. Some general tips for dealing with paper rejection I summarized in a short video, perhaps it's useful to you: What numbers are you using to get the 86%? "Returned" and "Timed Out" studies do not count in the Approved Submissions Rate. Mar 6, 2019 · The status “Awaiting reviewer selection” seems to indicate that the manuscript cleared the initial editorial screening. Got on Reddit, and asked people how many rejections it takes to get their first article out. I was rejected for not explaining the derivation of a highschool physics equation; this reviewer has had only 1 minor publication in my field in the last 16 years ( identified her The portal status changes to Awaiting decision for a few hours before the decision is shown. If they were to do a peer review it may end up a barely accept, a border line case or a flat rejection but with the amount of submissions they have it doesn't seem worth the work and effort of a peer review. Admin Dashboard （管理者ダッシュボード）に表示される査読プロセス中の論文ステータスは以下の通りです。 So today my “Awaiting Review” changed to “Awaiting Decision” and based on the discussions i saw earlier i think i won’t be receiving a positive mail from the uni. Check out the sidebar for intro guides. Felt a lot less worse and got working on the manuscript again 2 days later. Your manuscript has cleared desk screening and is being sent for peer review – that’s one step/obstacle crossed. Instead, they reject it outright based on an initial assessment. I submitted a manuscript to a journal about a week ago (via ScholarOne). All we ask for is a chance at reviews. May 8, 2024 · Desk rejection occurs when the editor of a journal decides not to send a submitted manuscript out for peer review. I submitted a manuscript 3 days ago to a reputed journal via Scholarone. Should I be worried? Is there anything I can do to accelerate this process? The problem is, I am planning to submit an adapted version of the manuscript as a book chapter. If they do reject it without review, that week delay the paper was probably on the AE's to-do list. Hi everyone. Your file is in final decision review. Rejected after revisions (minor or major), but before second peer review? Mar 13, 2022 · If the editorial management system (EMS) is distinguishing between the two, odds are "Awaiting Reviewer Selection" means the reviewers have not been invited yet, and "Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation" means the reviewers have not agreed to review the manuscript yet. Now the status has changed to ‘Awaiting ED recommendation’. " I haven't received a single proper rejection review and IDK what I might be doing wrong. " I don't think you should worry because this does not look like a case of desk rejection. I just got one of these as a reviewer. Easy process for everyone. If the editor is still looking for suitable reviewers for your paper, then he/she intends to send your paper for peer review. Is such a long waiting period normal? I would first ask the researcher if you could return the study instead of having the rejection. ' It has been a month now, but the status has not changed. academicjournalpublishing. One should cite papers, not journals. A colleague of ours had submitted an article two days prior and received a desk rejection about two weeks ago. For me desk rejection is a trigger for sending another paper there. I have submitted the paper on 31st January 2021. Most recent answer It means it will not be a desk reject. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. While such a quick change suggests that it may be a desk rejection, there may be some reason to hope. I responded immediately with: "Honest mistake, first-time NeurIPS submitters! Please give us a chance. I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I submitted a manuscript that went through the entire peer review process. co. Nor do any studies that are "Awaiting Review". Why would you want an editor to waste your time, and the labor of their staff and unpaid reviewers, to send something out for review that they don't plan to publish? Hi everyone! I would like to poll the general opinion on the following issue: There are some higher IF journals out there where the editors regularly ask me to review manuscripts, but when I for a change now and then submit one of our papers it gets desk(!) rejected with some vague, generic response. Reviewer Assignment:The status "awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editorial team is in the process of selecting and assigning new reviewers to evaluate your revised manuscript An exponential distribution seems likely, so the mean and standard deviation would be the same, and the probability of a desk rejection later than 3 weeks is about 17%, if the mean time to desk rejection is 1. It seems like 5 weeks is a very short time for it to be peer-reviewed, but almost 6 weeks under review seems like a long time for them to just desk reject it. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. So if it was an admit, then it'll show a Defer Acceptance section. After one day of submission, status was ‘Awaiting Decision’; but now after 10 days, status change into ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’. Role of Editors in the Submission Process Nov 19, 2020 · After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The status has not changed to ‘Under review’. I have seen rebuttal letters turn reject into revise & resubmit, and even desk reject into at least sending out for review. Does this mean it has crossed desk reject 2 years ago # QUOTE 2 GOOD 1 NO GOOD! Reply. Just give it some time; either you will get a decision or it will go for the review process. Even yesterday the status was still "awaiting reviewer selection", but today it was changed to "awaiting EIC decision". That means that journal was good enough for their precious work. Most journal usually do not reconsider resubmission. They have 3 days to respond otherwise it is an auto rejection. Nov 26, 2021 · I submitted a manuscript and the status changed from Awaiting AE assignment to Awaiting Referee Selection and then Awaiting Referee Assignment. This is the first stage of the peer-review process and your manuscript will be here until the assigned Editor has selected some suitable experts to invite to review. I've been rejected for grammar issues wherein the reviewer wrote like a kindergartner (not exaggerating). Does the status 'Awaiting Reviewer Selection' mean that the manuscript has passed desk rejection by the editor? Feb 26, 2021 · For further insights, you may go through this related query by another researcher: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? So, great. Many reasons could have lead to this: reviewers often have quota, so if they can accept only 1 out of 3 paper, maybe you just competed with better paper; your paper could be not a foot fit for this conf/journal; your paper could be not good enough for this journal/conf. May 30, 2020 · Coming to your present query, as we just indicated, this has been a slow change from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘Under Review. Awaiting recommendations: waiting for an editor to make a recommendation Recommendation can be "get another review" so it goes back to the review cycle. I don't know what this means and why it is taking so long. Aug 21, 2021 · If this status is updated soon after submission, it could mean a desk rejection. Aug 19, 2021 · Awaiting Reviewer Selection: This is ideally the first stage of the peer review process where the assigned Editor will select some suitable experts to invite to review your manuscript. Feb 18, 2022 · Awaiting Reviewer Selection. Please share your inputs on the attached screenshots and do they even mean anything. " Edit:- Forgot to mention: I first got rejected for MSCS and today my status got updated from Awaiting Review to Awaiting Decision (for MSAI & MSDS). Just submitted and desk rejected? Vague letter sent. Jul 1, 2017 · Reddit. A desk rejection, particularly at a journal like nature where there are a lot of submission, can definitely take more than a week. there is no specific time frame for this. The reader may still be an admin staffer who conducts editorial screening before passing it to the editor. Sep 18, 2020 · For instance, if ‘Awaiting Final Decision’ happened earlier, it may mean the AE first decided to refer their decision to the EIC, but changed their mind, and then decided to send it for review. In our previous two attempts, our paper was rejected, only to be accepted later by ICLR and NeurIPS. Then, after desk rejection, suddenly this journal is not worth citing anymore? Too personal and too unprofessional. Assisted desk rejects may involve obtaining one outside They likely have requested another review. Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. In my case, it always a stock comment like "This is a great paper but we unfortunately have to reject it because we have many paper submitted and we need t Jul 19, 2018 · My paper was submitted to a ScholarOne journal and the submission status changed in the following way: "Awaiting review assignment" for 2 weeks, "Awaiting AE recommendation" for 1 week, and now it is "Awaiting SE decision. Has anyone had any experience with this? Am i getting (another) desk reject? Google search didn't help much. It loaded (seemingly) from where it left off, and I finished the last 90 seconds of an 11 minute survey. Your article has secured the minimum number of required reviewers. This year, despite two acceptances, we faced one rejection (with the fourth review missing) without clear reasons or useful feedback. Peer review scores have been sent to the editor and the status is awaiting editor decision for almost 4 weeks now. Peer Review in Progress. Dec 7, 2018 · This would explain the status change from "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" back to "Awaiting Reviewer Selection. The worst part of the new change, though, is that you as an author have no control over the reviews. These status should not be taken seriously. I spent a lot of time going through their manuscript, which wasn't up to par, and recommended rejection (it was ultimately a reject-and-resubmit). I once had a paper "desk rejected" because an editor hit the wrong button and forgot to request a resubmission. After two weeks, one of the reviews was complete. This can happen, e. You can usually get things moving by sending a friendly follow up — I got one pushed through this way a month ago after it was “awaiting editor assignment” for 2 months. No it doesn’t make a difference, and it’s faster and more direct. I think this really varies from journal to journal. Your Application Details START TERM Fall 2023 DEGREE SOUGHT Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) PROGRAM College of Engineering - Mechanical Engineering CAMPUS Boston STATUS Awaiting Review At least it seems the paper went out for review (and this wasn't a desk rejection). the employee of the publisher assigned to the journal) or the editor-in-chief assigns an editorial board member to handle the paper. While the differences in average review time between one field and another are staggering (one month for the Whole process in neuroscience, 8 months in engineering), usually it's something like you don't even see the choice of the editor and maybe it's 3-4 days between when it gets to the editor and Apr 23, 2020 · So, we have made some edits/assumptions. " Should I expect a desk rejection? I first ask them to provide institutional affiliations. Does that mean desk rejection? Over the past three weeks, NeurIPS 2020 program chairs have tasked area chairs (AC) and senior area chairs (SAC) with the job of summary rejection (aka desk-rejects): ACs did a light read of the papers and identified those they believed would not be accepted, and SACs cross-checked the selections, according to a NeurIPS blog post. For instance, it’s not clear if the initial status was ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ or whether there was some other status prior to that. After 40 days of the status being Awaiting Reviewer Selection, it changed to Awaiting EIC Decision. – It is not a good start that is for sure but your approval rating will be based on approved studies to rejected studies, you ignore the awaiting review and returned studies to work out your approval rating which needs to be above 95% at a minimum. Simply cut out the Conclusion. This can get sticky as there are shit reviewers out there. A few days ago, it was changed to "awaiting reviewer selection". Here the status could show "Editor assigned", or it could show "awaiting reviewer invitation". “Awaiting Reviewer Selection. However, if the status before this was “awaiting reviewer selection”, it implies that the manuscript has successfully cleared the editorial screening stage and now the editorial board is in process of finding suitable peer reviewers for your paper. For example, if two reviewers have engaged with your manuscript but a third reviewer has not been secured, or if a reviewer was secured but had to withdraw and hasn’t yet been replaced This twitter thread also mentions getting a desk reject for a simple mistake like using the wrong file format. (The journal I submitted to allows it to be reprinted by Yes, the chances of rejection have definitely increased in the bag held back by the editor. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. For many smaller journals, once it gets past the edotor's desk reject stage (into the assigning AE stage), and subsequently assigning reviewers stage, it is largely safe to say that it will get some sort of review. What’s mean? Wait? Reject? Waitlist? Accept? It’s really make depress! Upload Materials You can no longer upload materials. Sep 12, 2020 · Editors and journals take this rather seriously. According to the tracking link, two reviewers accepted to review the manuscript. Related reading: What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? As I understand, this may indicate that the peer-review process is complete and the editor(s) could be deciding whether to accept/reject my manuscript. Desk (or Bench) Reject Policy. At my journal we ask our AE's to make the initial decision (select reviewers or decline without review) within a week of being assigned a paper, but it often takes longer. Once enough reviewers have been selected, the manuscript will move on to the next stage. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Atm, it's best to keep an eye on everything Awaiting Review, and jump on any nasty red rejections as soon as you can. Scenario 2: awaiting reviewer selection>> under review If this was the way the status had changed Since 7/27 the status of my manuscript is awaiting reviewer invitation. For my first peer reviewed article, I got a rejection in a month. May 3, 2018 · So I ask how a paper takes long time like that for the review process and usually the editors when they invite a reviewer, they ask him to finish the review process within 3 weeks. Desk rejects (what you received) boil down to 2 things: perceived quality fit If an editor believes that the paper isn’t good enough to be reviewed, they won’t bother wasting the time of an already stretched (volunteer) reviewer pool. Sociologist 95d. This subreddit is for anyone who is going through the process of getting into graduate school, and… If you think it's really important, and that the journal is the best place for it, then it may be worth writing a rebuttal. This change has occurred Nov 16, 2015 · Scenario 1: with editor/under editor evaluation >> awaiting reviewer selection >> under review If this is how the status had changed the first time you submitted the paper, then chances are that your paper is actually being sent for a re-review. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. If you think you should be paid, just explain your situation and see where it goes. Reviewer selection is as close to a lottery as it can get. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? The Reddit Law School Admissions Forum. Mar 5, 2019 · In short, the switching of the status repeatedly from “awaiting reviewer selection” to “awaiting reviewer assignment” and back implies that the editor is having a hard time finding reviewers for your paper. blogspot. The best place on Reddit for admissions advice. As of today, it says "Awaiting Recommendation". This decision is typically made if the manuscript is deemed unsuitable for the journal, either due to its content or failure to meet specific submission criteria. Awaiting Editor Decision A quick desk reject is the second best outcome. If oth reviews recommend the paper to not to progress to phase 2 ( because there are issues which cannot be resolved within the review cycle), then the meta reviewer will take a look and decide whether the paper will progress. You pay $2k, they review it. This journal was the the most appropriate for this manuscript. Mar 13, 2020 · Does the status "Awaiting final decision" within a week of submission indicate desk rejection? What does a status change from "Awaiting reviewer score" back to "Awaiting reviewer assignment" mean? Answered by Editage Insights on 16 Mar, 2020 Sep 15, 2020 · As you already seem to know, the Awaiting Decision status means that the AE has made a decision on the manuscript and referred this decision to the Editor-in-Chief (EIC) for the final decision. They also have like a 60% desk reject rate, and it's completely subjective based on whether the editor is interested or not, not any objective metrics. Just got it back as a revised manuscript (and it appears there are some revisions), but they did not submit a response document. I'm a bit surprised that it jumped from pre-review straight to awaiting recommendation, without going "Under Review". are out already but I don't think there is an official 'final' date for desk rejects as far as I know. I've published in medical journals, in physics/engineering journals and in neuroscience ones. Some of the most cited papers in VLDB are on JOINs or TIME SERIES or GPUs. Post Markup: Rejection after review is almost surely because of the reviewers' decision, regardless on whether the topic of your paper suits their journal or not. I know the peer-review process is long and arduous, so I generally don't bother anyone unless its been about 4 months (so far, I have heard Aug 4, 2018 · It then moved to ‘Awaiting reviewer selection’ and stayed at that stage for 9 days. Of course, one cannot be sure, but the status changes seem to indicate a higher possibility of a desk rejection, that is, a rejection without peer review. What does this mean? Was the manuscript reviewed? I think the status should have changed to something like Awaiting Reviewer Scores before Awaiting EIC Decision. With the status of my current submission, I am worried whether it implies a desk rejection. I similarly had a completely fact-free desk rejection, which we appealed, and where other editors agreed with our criticism but said, "oh we don't think this has the impact for eLife anyway". Unless desk rejected, Reject decisions may be based on a thorough single review. You submit to a highly specialized paper to a journal. Go to "Reviews", "Awaiting Review" and click on the "Review Item" next to the item you want to edit. I can't find the exact average time but for most papers, it took two to three months between submitted, revised, and accepted status. Some editorial systems give the Dec 28, 2024 · 投的chinese journal of catalysis 目前状态是Awaiting Reviewer Selection，会被编辑直接拒搞吗？还是现在还在选择审稿人准备送审了？ fl_iceee 2024-12-28 2436 次浏览赞 417 Yeah just send the journal a message. Reasons of desk rejection. If you haven't gotten an admit yet, it means that they have overadmitted people. they will want to make sure the top choice accepts their offer before they cut you loose. After another two weeks I got the decision letter. "Awaiting Reader Selection" But some people say "Awaiting Reader Selection" is different from " "Awaiting Reviewer Selection". rqrdw tuorpv qmslczj mmtf sulgx wrpia kfiy hsljy blyy nzdxzet

Awaiting reviewer selection desk reject reddit. Building an effective reviewer database.

Awaiting reviewer selection desk reject reddit. One should cite papers, not journals.