5900x or 5950x reddit

5900x or 5950x reddit. It’s very much professional software, and most professional Resolve boxes use Xeon or Threadripper processors with higher core counts than the 5950X, along with 3+ GPUs. Before i got 19. Price/core upgrade is quite expensive here. RAM recommendations for 5900x or 5950x. bbertram2. It’s 2x32mb, 32 unified per 8 cores. Finally AMD pushed through the 5ghz barrier (according to Tom's Hardware , it went upto 5. In 5 years the difference between 16 cores and 12 cores is unlikely to mean the difference between totally unusable or not. Just qflash your bios with the newest update and your all good. Share. co/ZgdwBx3 A bit more sensitive on ACC: https://ibb. I've been thinking about getting the 5950x since all the cores really speed up compiling etc. Ryzen 5900x or 5950x mainly for programming. Running Ryzen 5950X + Noctua NH-DH15 Chromax Black on X570 Aorus Master. ROG Strix B550-XE. 3950X in DaVinci Resolve), for some things the 5950X should be faster by a significant margin. R7 7700X: Not impressive at all, Can't barely beat a i7 12700K on gaming performance and MC is worse than it and is pretty much screwed against upcoming i7 13700K. ago. So I'd say that the 5950X could provide a bit of time saving, and therefore be worth forking out a little more. Cod warzone which is my most played game at the moment had steadier framerate and less gpu timing (gpu latency metric in their option). The Ryzen 5000 series is roughly 7-14% faster than Ryzen 3000 on different tasks in AE. A 5900x or 5950x will be more relevant and hold better value if you intend to stay with it. 02v, some need 0. Something like a 6800X would be much better for Ryzen 5950X & 5900X Geekbench 5 Benchmarks. 3. Utilization of cores doesn't mean it performance 5900x with NH-U12S and PBO2 on. Given that the all-core boost-clock is just 100 MHz higher on the 5950X and the practiability between 12 and 16 cores right now for your mentioned workflow is very similar, I would go with the 5900X and use the extra cash to get a better graphics card or faster storage & memory. If you don't do any productivity work I guess the 5800x3d would be a better choice. 148V, or <180W PPT. When GPU bottlenecked lows for 10900k and 5900x are at 100 and 120 fps for 0. YES it is a 5950X but in gaming they show same performance - so it is the same with the 5900X. If it was really that much better I suspect AMD wouldnt have missed the opportunity to slap an "XT" on the model number and update the microcode 1 tick to get you that sweet 5. 181V but as soon as my CPU hit 80 degrees, hashrate dropped to 16kH/s. In this case, the 5900X is a $500 chip, the 12700K is a $400 chip. You want to future proof a bit, take a 5800x. It highly depends on game, settings and resolution. Reply. The 12900k is AI overclocked (cause I’m lazy) @5. The CPU looks very promising, could Intel's demise. For video editing, it would depend on what you're doing exactly. I play a lot of games (mostly competitive) like Apex, Valorant, Fortnite, Overwatch 2 but I also play some stuff like Minecraft (very intensive) or GTA V. Got my 5950x to boost to 5. For a 5950X, that is normally around a 0. Making the transfer of information faster/smoother cause the amount of cores you would use for gamins is on the same side. so that's probably the route i would go. The 5950x has better 3DMark scores because it has better multi-threaded productivity performance (seperate from gaming performance). techtonic69. In the long run, a 5900X should fare better than a 5600X, but it's also likely to be worse than a mid-range CPU available two years from now. Ryzen 9 5900 or 5950x for gaming, streaming, recording and potentially some video editing. It should be ~20 W. For almost everything other than gaming the 5900X will be better. Unless you want to use quicksync. Of course, you could wait until September and get in on the AM5 platform with Zen 4. You don't really need to worry about core affinity for Zen 3 (Ryzen 5000 series) generation of CPU's. If you are experiencing performance issues, it's probably somewhere else in your system. Yet ANOTHER 5900x vs 5950x question, but from a slightly different perspective. Use HWinfo to check the power consumption of your CPU (PPT in W) at "idle". 5900x is already such a monster for multi-core with really strong single core performance, basically the same as 5950x. Build Upgrade. At workloads the 5950X shines, with DDR4 3800+ it is a beast and i am glad i upgraded. If you are just gaming, the 7800x3d is much better. I'll stick with my original preference - 5950x for double (16c/32t vs 8c/16t) the core/thread count, 66% (64mb vs 96mb) of L3 cache, 133% ($590 vs $450 retail - who knows what market price will be) of the price. EDIT: If you're upgrading from an FX-8350 you could go for a much tamer 5700X. I plan to buy this exact CPU and pair it with 32GBs of Ram and a MSI MAG X570 Motherboard and use my GTX 1070 I have while I wait for GPU prices to go down. I'd take the 10 cores over 8 cores for the future. Early testing and bencharks lean on the i7 12700k over 5900x but not over a 5950x. The AMD chip should cost less to run as it'll use less power to encode. I used process lasso and selected core 0,2,4,6,8,10 while putting coherent UI on 16-31 and got an fps boost. Tuned stable curve (0 and +2 on two best cores, other cores ranging from -15 to -30), settled on TDC 160A and EDC 180A, +MHz don't really affect the nT R23 score so left at 0 Mhz. 1 5, 5950X is running 4400Mhz on CCX1 and 4350Mhz on CCX2 using 1. Where 5900x and 5950x shine is productivity. [deleted] • 3 yr. If you have to ask, 5900x is probably fine. In the typical 1440p - 4k resolutions, the performance impact with the extreme CPUs is much smaller. So for a 5900X the delta will likely be somewhere in the middle and probably not close to 400 MHz, even if you had a better AiO. Max temp - 53. If not, check your background processes. Tbh if you dont know the difference, you probably dont need it. They are limited to 8 cores per As someone with both a 5800x3D and a 5950x, just get the 5800x3D to get most out of your 6950xt. I'd say if you can afford it, get the better CPU; you can delay upgrading & enjoy the benefits of a faster CPU now. Wouldn't say its worth dropping the money to go from B0 to B2 necessarily. The thing is Zen 3 really benefits from higher Ram speeds and Infinity fabric speeds for CPU's with 2 CCXs like 5900x/5950x. So it really comes down to two things. Okay. The 2nd iteration of the family should squash most of the early adopter bugs with chipsets, and of course, let the DDR5 market cool down. The 5950X is using DDR4-3866 cl28. but it is rather pricey. • 2 yr. 5950x is made for the . But that is only for workloads and your specific software used. GB5 to the end to see frequencies. Low-noise adapter fitted and pretty casual fan curve, it's all about the rad. Most of the questions out here are "will the 5950x get me more frames" and I've absorbed all the advise there. Obviously, the 5950X supports way more ram, which is handy and has a much bigger Turbo Boost Frequency. Sure the 4090 and 16c/32t + turbo is nice on the 7950x, but if the tasks you use aren’t utilizing the power of the 7950x then it might be worth it to hold off on an upgrade considering I use my 5900x as a workstation and even then it’s a bit overkill. hans-tweaker. You will definitely want to do some tweaks, enabling PBO2 for a negative voltage offset and playing with package power limits. 5950X has more cores, but a lower frequency per core. 5800X and 32GB of RAM. Watts - 149. ROG Strix B550-E Gaming. Does anyone here have experience using both CPU's in a gaming PC have any thoughts. TLDR; If you are okay with ram OC, buy 5900x and try and get some new ram as fast as you can go (2x16 or 2x32), or just get the 5950x and be happy about the upgrade. It’s a lot better than it used to be when 1st gen was released but it still does odd thread switching rather than keeping threads to the one CCX. 5900X looking appealing. It is the fastest gaming CPU at the moment. 5Ghz if heavy load on 2 cores. Not like it's a slouch at 1440 though. Unless there isn't a huge difference in mid level ram and Conclussion : if you want flawless fluidity in games you take a 5950X and put in on a Gigabyte Aorus Master or Dark Hero VIII. imo the 5900x will be plenty. I've got a 5950x running on a video encoding rig. For the same money I could get the 5900x, which still has quite many cores, and upgrade my ram (from 32gb 2500MHz to 64gb 3200MHz. It's crazy how much of an effect the cache does for a memory hungry game like skyrim or VRChat. 1% that needs the cpu for mainly content creation. How much this matters would depend on the kind of software you plan on running. IMtoppercentage97. 1ghz) as we know 12700K matches the 5900X in multi-threaded performance and obliterates it in single-threaded as per these tests . 5950 is more expensive because it was built more in line with consumer data crunching and video editing. Those are two very different use cases of CPU. Mostly depends on luck (my 5900x can boost with CO and shiz up to 5150), but with 5950x you have more of a chance to get higher clocks both in static OC or curve adjustments. What "productivity" are you doing that you'd need a top of the line CPU for. For 1440p and higher, you will rarely see more than 5% difference compared to 12gen Intel. Still, I seriously consider if I even need my RTX 3090 5950X Beast of a PC which I love, but for If gaming is your top priority, then the 5800X3D. Ok so I bought the 5950x when it was brand new in Q4 2020. The goal is have the voltage droop on all core workloads allowing the cores to boost higher within edc, and using offset to keep single core voltage high enough to be stable. Most common example would be uncompressing files, the 5800x3d would done it two time longer than the 5950x basically. Added 13 watts for the same amount of work. Some background software is likely causing your CPU to boost continuously. 5900x has fewer cores than 5950x, but because the frequency is higher and most games, if not nearly all games, don't utilize a crazy amount of cores they benefit more from the 5900x with the higher core frequency in testing. B550 Aorus Pro. 0. Can‘t say anything about the 5950x but as mentioned here already single-core performance is very important at the moment. Could get a 5900x for same price, $150 more for 5950x. The Ryzen 7 5700 would be more than sufficient and should probably come at a significantly lower price. I've got a 3090 sat here waiting to run Cyberpunk. childofthekorn. 5900x is more than enough ( just got mine for Blender + gaming). Sure, there are faster, newer CPUs with impressive benchmarks, but real-world you're hardly going to notice the difference. At stock a 12700k is slower than a 5900x. go for B550 if your not on budget side. Request. I use the rig for workloads and gaming. I had better results bringing my lowest performing cores in -30 range and keeping the boost override to minimum at +50 Mhz. 5950x has two 8 core ccx. Award. During gaming (1440p), CPU was around 55-70 °C. Here is the 5950X on 2133 RAM, 3200 RAM and 4000 RAM - not a big influence for iRacing: https://ibb. 7700x. I'm building a new PC and my current options at CPU are 5900x or 5950x. I'm trying to build two PCs for relatives. There'll be zero discernible difference in games, and unless you're compiling massive projects daily or something the amount the 5950x will make a difference is pretty much the same as games versus the 5900x. 99. CPU Pinning is still useful because not allowing the host CPU Scheduler to move things around gives more consistent performance and latency, albeit is on systems with complex topologies that not doing so would incur in a Ryzen 9 5900x or 5950x. 99), (5800X3D - $399. The CPU will be paired with RTX 4070Ti, 32GB Ram and MSI MAG B550 It seems to be hard for me to tell. Got a 5900x for my CPU. Well, i upgraded from a 3900X to a 5950X. mcoombes314. Did some basic OC, big thanks to u/Millosh_R and u/-bosmang-for helpful guides. I know this question has been asked a million times, but anyway, this may be a bit more specific to me. Announced at $450. 5900x is pretty much as good as it gets for after effects, I use it and it's mostly single core power that just bruteforces the render preview. Boosted to 4600 then occasionally to 4575 then back to 4600. hello, can i use ESXi with Ryzen 9 5950X ? yes, but you need supported network cards and supported storage. So the 5950x is faster in heavily multithreaded tasks but consumes more power and is way more expensive. Yes, it is. You don't need anything beefier unless you're going to do heavy tasks for a looong time. JohnLietzke. 5800x3d is more gaming focused, editing and rendering is the 5900x territory. In some cases they are equal, other cases the 5950X edges out, and then in other cases the 5900X leads. Still great. Edit: 11900k is a money grab. 05v core offset, some can get away with 0. capn_hector. You will spend more on RAM and motherboard with a 7700X build, so there is really no competition here. 2. They didnt do that, so I strongly suspect that the hoopla made over The benefit that the 5950x has over the 5900x is on each side of the CCD, there are 8 cores. I've seen a few people claiming to have switch from 5900x/5950x to 5800x3d and not regretting it. The regular M1 even has a 43% higher memory bandwidth. I’d go 5900X for your use case and your thinking of it lasting 5+ years is a good move a 5950X isn’t worth the extra money it’s just more cores. It was a much more obvious choice when comparing the two CPU's when looking at the initial price points. Same with RDR2. Measured with XmRig 10m Benchmark. R9 7900X: Seems pretty impressive as well, but the upcoming i7 13700K might get too close to it's MC for cheaper price, and will likely beat it on gaming performance. Otherwise it seems a 10900k beats it in gaming. So running 1080p or even 1440p on a high refreshrate display (even just upto 144hz) there's a good boost on 1% lows going with the 5800X3D. No, 5950X is a very fast CPU and at 4K res, your GPU will be the limiting factor. This means that if a game uses more than 6 cores it has latency from the infinity fabric. Idles at 38-45, usually under 75 in various load tasks, can be 80+ in cinebench but stays within limits and boosts well. I personally run about 10 VMs in a NetScaler HA frontended CVAD deployment with my 5950/64. 5900x is a good all-around CPU for gaming, productivity, and other task with 12c/24t, which is enough for 99% of people. Using CTR 2. If C4D/3D work is your top priority AND it can make use of more than 8 cores, then either the 5900X or 5950X, depending on how much performance you want to buy. Check out Optimum Tech's video on "Ryzen 9 5950x vs. In games, you would notice better 1% lows, so less stuttering. Gaming wise there will be an improvement but not enough to warrant the cost for anyone but rich So you running a 5900X stock will be good. 5950 definitely for gaming/multitasking. 9. As most games use 8 cores this is theatrically better because all 8 cores used for gaming will be ok the same core complex and From current reviews, the 5800X3D will be the fastest DDR4 gaming CPU, although obviously the more GPU bottleneck you have the less that would matter. I have everything but the mobo picked out, and am having a tough time narrowing it down. The 12900KS and 5800x3D are tested in 1080p mostly to show the biggest impact. co/qJptQjt. TUF x570-Pro. I have the 5950x and strix 4090 and have not found a game where it bottlenecks at 4k native or dlss quality. I consider the 5800x3d more of a high refresh rate 1080p cpu. IF you don't care about accidental glitches, stutters, mini secs freezes get 5900X. I have an MSI X570 godlike that I'll be using for the build. First AMD Hawk Point laptops hit the market: HP Envy X360 14 convertible with Ryzen 7 8840HS now available for $1,049. Gaming performance is pretty similar across the Zen3 lineup. 5900x cost less per core than 5950x. The 12700K has better IPC and clocks on the P-cores, so ST performance is clearly better on the Intel chip. The 5900X/5950X are NOT included, because they have two dies and inter-die latency and independent Cache L3 still applies. Hash per watt - 126. 5950x is overkill for gaming. Just let the scheduler do its thing. I've yet to really see any tasks, including streaming while running multiple servers, that really have stressed out a 5900x while gaming. The biggest issues I've had with ryzen is the lack of pci express lanes and therefore PCI express slots for expansion. 5900x+250€=5950x. Compilation, rendering, etc. I'm using a ryzen 3950x and the 5950x is just more instructions, so it'll boot fine. I work as a software developer using Visual Studio and sometimes (not to often ( I play games. Asking because 5800X vs 5900X is the decision point for me, mostly gaming but keen to futureproof as much as reasonably possible since it's the end of the socket's life and realistically even from 5800X the upgrade to a 5950X in a few years would be silly, so I'm happy to overspend on my CPU to extend its life and therefore the life of my ADMIN MOD. I have aircooled my 5950X and it goes to around 84 or so on r23 multicore and gets around 28,4k score at that. The Ryzen 9 5950X does not have video capability so After Effects doesn’t scale much with cores. The tier list linked by u/matte_0310 is a very good reference. If you need the cores in the 5900X it will outperform the 7600X, and really in that world what you really want is the 5950X. The 5950 is 800$ vs 5900 for 550$ or almost 70 pct more. You'll still be looking at multiple times the CPU performance, all in a tidy little 65W (90W Either way if you prefer not overspending or don't find a 5950X for a good deal, the 5900X is quite the upgrade over a 3700X and should be able to handle what you throw at it. That seems like a good use for the 5950x. Lowest fps is 2133 obviously then 3200 and then 4000. Number of VMs is workload dependent. it's borderline. •• Edited. • 3 yr. Dont bother with 5800x3d if your wanting to upgrade go 5900x or 5950x more cores will be smoother and perform better overall in couple years compared to slightly faster 8 cores. I'll try to work and save up an extra few hundred. Both pc's should now be chilling for the next 4 to 5 years without breaking the bank. Hi everyone, I want to upgrade my PC and i am not sure for which CPU to go? If it worth £160 extra for an 5950x for Gaming and Streaming only, i mostly play CS2 and sometimes Valorant and PUBG, i will also keep open streamlabs le obs, discord and spotify. My overclocked 6700k system hasn't had a single failed boot or blue screen in the 5yrs I've had it. Only way for it to be 64mb of unified cache would be for all 12/16 cores to be on the same die. I run a 5950x on a b450 aorus pro and it seems to preform well. For a gaming build, the better comparison would be the 5800X3D. OP • 5 mo. wellgo for the best. The Crosshair VIII boards from Asus are nice, but price/features isn't as good as 4. Think about people who bought coffee lake instead of zen1. My personal favourites to recommend on the high end are the X570 Aorsu Master, X570 Taichi and X570 Unify. Actually it does, it runs with exactly the same principle as PBO, exactly the same, only more aggressive. 5900x and 5950x are completely overkill for gaming. If a 5950X can run a game smoothly, then a 5600X can, too. I wouldn’t, VRM would need steady airflow to maintain the higher power demand. I'm in the same boat as you (making music with plugins and virtual instruments) and the 5600X looks good, the 5800X is priced badly IMO, such that you might as well get a 5900X. A 5950x with 64GB RAM is well suited to home lab virtualization. The 5900x being dual CCD 12 cores only has 6 cores on each side of the CCD. I reseated the cooler yesterday and temps went down about 5°C. 47mm cooler" (video) to get more an idea of what is being dealt with. Mostly performance loss from productivity stuffs. I have NH-U12A on 5800X in Fractal Define R3 (old but still good). Simultaneously increasing the boost override to +200 Mhz and lowering the cores in curve optimizer gave me some poor results. 5900x is also overkill for Since then, my 5900X arrived and I've put it in my NR200 + Noctua NH-L12S and run some benchmarks. There is always bottleneck, creating a frame depends on CPU + GPU. For gaming, the 7600X is better, and really the 5800X3D is a better choice than the 5900X. You make a 200 dollars economy. Below is the build, and here is the list of my mobo options: ROG Strix x570-E. It definately doesn't scale anywhere near linearly in any game. Skyrim VR went from a stutterfest to being as smooth as butter. If you're not tight money. 12900k, RTX 3080 and 2x16GB DDR5 5600 is running the game anywhere from 40 to 100 fps depending on the usual factors. The jump from the 3900x to the 5950x was notable in 1% lows in gaming. Are your renders taking long enough where that difference could be significant enough for you to finish work Im currently getting around 20. 06v; but you get the idea. Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog (5950X - $479. -9. The swap made a giant difference for me, especially for VR. Note: Add . 0GHz on the box. Which ever has lower tdp. 5900x technically outperforms 5950x in certain single/light threaded applications. Dan I'd be really interested to see benchmarks for iRacing running the 5600x vs the 10900 (overclocked to 5 / 5. ROG x570 Crosshair VIII Hero. The 7800x3d is a gaming focused CPU. Maximum temperature was 85 °C (which was measured in Cinebench R20 Multicore), with an Arctic P14 on the side-panel of the NR200, as well as the standard NF-A12x15 in high-clearance mode. It is pricier, but it is much better. PBO could have been on by default for the 5000 series and Intel would be decently behind. The number 1 priority for the CPU is gaming, but I am planning on giving streaming a go along with recording my gameplay at the same time, so Get the 5900x, you save money and you only lose around 1% and sometimes even gain 1% and more. OTOH AMD's PBO settings in BIOS (go google AMD PPT TDC EDC) gives you the ability to dial that boost mode back down to sane levels and get most of the performance with less power and heat. So don't hate on Apple when it comes to hardware going forward; if you do, you look silly. I had to move the 5950x to 1v, its now less effective but still very good. My system specs are: 5950x, Aorus Master x570s, rx 570 8gb, 32gb dr4 3200, 4tb pcie gen…. Bit strange that it's higher than 5950x single core. You'll probably be spending around $75 more on platform costs given motherboard with the 12700K, so cost is basically the same. It seems to be the option for high end but not ridiculous overkill like a 5950/i9 12900k pricing territory for marginal gains. A 5950X would require a better cooling solution comparatively. 8. Usually the stepping improvements lead to very small improvements to things like performance and temperature. I do expect the 5900x to be in stock before the 5950x but who knows when that will be. Not everything is about gaming. The prices are almost the same for both 7700X and 5900X. As for the Long Run, I'd just wait until AM5 comes out, get a 5900x, 5950x, or whatever 3d chip is out, on the used market, from those early adopters. There aren't many board that cost as much as a 5950X, but the X570 Aorus Xtreme comes to mind. 99), (5900X - $359. Even the 5900x would be far better than a 11900k and cheaper likely if available. 1 Ghz max. Minecraft also has no benefits from 3d vcache unfortunately, and will benefit more from the higher clocks of the 5950x or 5900x, and even more so from better ram. In 5 years the best and second best cpu from today will be indistinguishable. It's because of the memory. Gaming only 5900 would be just fine. 5800x+140€= 5900x. Edit: Thank you all for your help. For your use case it certainly will be. It’s honestly really overkill for a 3080 - the cheaper 7600x/non-x would be Neither CPU is going to behave well under a single-fan AIO, that's for sure, but the 5950X will fare much better during load periods than the egregiously hot-running 12900K. 99) (MICROCENTER IN If not, 5900X should speed things up significantly. If not just keep your 5800x its perfectly fine cpu. What was shown in the headlines is far from guaranteed of what B2 actually gets you. One for gaming, another for a worstation. 1% lows and 1% lows and for 5600x it's 94 and 82fps as well as about 20 fps difference for average frame rate. Most people should get the 5900X instead, unless the last 4 cores are absolutely going to make or break you (or if you really need them then wait for a Threadripper 5000). Based on benchmarks I've seen (of 3900X vs. 5600x is enough today. The takeaway is that the difference won't be appreciable and most games won't benefit from higher core count and larger L3 cache since The Alpenfohn Black Ridge is probably your best-bet air cooler (47mm height). Xilarch. It's also running cooler than the 12900k but not as cool as a 5900. 6kH/s @1. I have yet to do the curve optimization so that should help it a bit (the score mostly as it seems power limited, not temp limited) so the curve optimization should just increase the freqs until it faces the power limit again. The i5 13600k + TUF z690-PLUS cost 690€ together (nice) and the Ryzen 9 5900X + B550-F WiFi II costs 610€. 10900k/10850k are basically as good and trade blows with the 11900k while being far cheaper. In CB23 it hit 90°C regularly at 130W of power and scored about 15300 (CO set to -22). The 7700x will be upgradeable In the future, the 5900x will not. 2kH/s but i am not done tuning. The 5950X would be overkill. upvotes. So no. I also work some magic in premiere in 1080p 60fps footage that come around 10 Keep in mind that Ryzen TDP means very little, a 105W TDP part is by default allowed to pull 142W for mostly as long as it can keep itself cool. Also, Zen 3 single core performance increases with core count, the 5950X is faster in single core performance than the 5600X. 99), (5600 - $149. The point is 5900x and 5950x CPU's are one bios click away from having better performance, better efficiency and better temps. 5900X should be fine. You need to seriously overlock it and let it eat power for it to even come close to a 5950x on preset slow (preset the site uses for all benches). 5800X testing here: In other words if its crushing the 5800x it'll do the same to the 5900x. And compare it with Techspot's 5800X3D vs. the 13700k is the stronger performer for your workloads (which iirc are very single-thread dependent so maybe you don't need to bother with the extra cores?), but a 5900x is an in-socket upgrade and the difference between them isn't huge. Get a 5800X, a lot cheaper than 5900 or 5950X and not much of a difference in performance. Since streaming is real time and the 5900x is easily strong enough, it sounds like the best option. xvrickh. Yes. If you were to have a main use case of gaming at or under 1440p it likely would not, but video editing and other productive tasks will benefit from it greatly, and 2160p will both benefit from next gen. the 5950X is just there to milk the people who gotta have the absolute best. AMD says the only difference is B2 helps them with production and there’s no performance difference. As for whether it is worth it, the 5950X from what I understand is about 18% faster than the 5900X for many 3D rendering benchmarks. The difference between the 5900X and 5950X is minimal. ComputerBase found 322 MHz delta for a 5950X between the AiO watercooler and the AF34, and 118 MHz for the 5800X. AMD718. 6-8 years is subjective. 5900x is 12 cores and presumably two 6 core ccx. Built a new PC around a 5900X last year (£289, new, in UK) - absolutely no regrets. . Price difference between those 2 is 140€. Cuz best way to test a cpu is gaming!!! -14. A 5600X will work fine for gaming now (the 5900X won't be that much better), but you'd have to accept that it's not the absolute best. The high temps at low load is very unlikely to be a hardware problem, but rather a software one. ) 5900x. I plan to replace my ryzen 2700x for something new, either 5900x or 5950x, but cannot decide which one is the best fit. Because of the less cores, the 5900x will also run cooler which means in theory if The oc is good, it will be more superior. If you're not going to try and do some giga turbo overclock, the 12700K is the better pick - I make this disclaimer because while overall the better performers, Alder Lake CPUs have a strange behavior where the integrated heat Hello, I do game development (Unreal 5, Maya, Substance) and I'm upgrading my cpu soon. And in those cases, the 4 additional cores are great. Multicore performance is my priority, single core is good . Also, 5950x is clearly superior in benching as you can disable SMT and get 16 pure cores (for TS CPU test for example, or some older 3dmarks) 0. WierdDoodle2767. My previous build used budget ram but this time since the other parts are upper tier I'd like the ram to be too. 125ghz ). If you're using your system to make money and use blender or something where finishing something highly-threaded 20% faster is worth spending another $200. You own one of the fastest CPUs available, even if it's a generation old now. •. How are the fps though I like to know. Thanks. Its really just 1-2% gaming performance in average between the best and mid-range CPUs and using a 3090-Ti. People didn't understand this guys question at all. Runs very well and plenty of resources left over for concurrent gaming. I'm a software engineer as well, and a 2700x has been plenty for all of the applications you mention. Some games can make use of additional cores, but it's not guaranteed. But if you check borderlands 3 directX12 even 7700k have virtually the same frametime as any modern CPU. I have a B450 AORUS ELITE motherboard and I'm The 5950x has 16 cores while the 5900x has 12. I've decided to wait for the R7 7700X, due to better performance in games and major future proofing. em fc cv zo nb ve rc fk pl qb