Nad c368 vs cambridge cxa81. Will keep older CXA81 which is still working.
Nad c368 vs cambridge cxa81 can you guys give me advice? Because i can not go to the store for demo. Hello, i would some guidance. Feb 13, 2016 · Anything that was NAD's responsibility to deliver is buggy/mediocre. I think it would not only outperform both the amps on your list, but would add multi-room streaming functionality from a brand with a well-supported, stable streaming app, has Bluetooth and a moving magnet phono stage. Though it has the same sleek, minimalistic design with brushed aluminum front panel and chunky volume knob, it sports an new upgraded ESS Sabre DAC that offers even more clarity and musicality. (Well, $100 more). I *think* the Cambridge CXA81 L'ampli-DAC Cambridge CXA81 délivre 2 x 80 watts de puissance sous 8 ohms. Apr 12, 2024 · Cambridge Audio has launched a sequel to its Award-winning CXA81 stereo amplifier. Recent. The latter is in a different league. The CXA81 features two powered channels and a subwoofer output to create a detailed 2. Cambridge Audio CXA81 Back View (Click the image for the larger version) Inputs. I'm repeating myself, but I believe you can't go wrong with any of these either. But Arcam is a rather rare name these days. You may look also on NAD amp with integrayed Bluos platform. In this review, we will be comparing C 388 and CXA81, two Integrated Amplifiers from NAD and Cambridge. Also works well with Dali. I examined how the THD+N percentage changed with frequency at 12. Or that Arcam simply hasn’t been that popular in the past decade. CXA81/Quad S2 speakers The CXA81 brought out the best from the Quad S2's ribbon tweeter, producing upper-midrange and treble frequencies with tactile richness and great sense of life. Thank you. Jan 18, 2022 · NAD is 180 watts per channel, Cambridge is 150. May 18, 2024 · Cambridge Audio amplifiers, on the other hand, emphasize finesse and detail, with a focus on delivering a pure and articulate sound. May 28, 2021 · The Cambridge CXA81 specs show that it uses ESS Sabre ES9016K2M which is an upgraded one and performs better than CXA61. ) Well, if you check the AST reviews I linked (and provided that NAD C 368 power supply is very similar to C 268), NAD gives more instantaneous power to 4 ohms than CXA81. NAD C 368 vs NAD C 338 Integrated Amplifier Comparison In this review, we will be comparing C 368 and C 338, two Integrated Amplifiers by NAD. I will be adding matching CD players and possibly a turntable down the road. I decided to move up the Cambridge range and traded the AXR100 back to Cambridge for the CXA81. Phono Input Dec 2, 2023 · Both are feature rich and have the same DAC, but the Cambridge is more involving and resolving, whereas the Yamaha has more power and control. Many best value gears are in this price range. Además, la firma ha decidido eliminar los controles de balance y tono del panel frontal, el único elemento que no acababa de encajar. I was offered a pretty good deal, at $800 CAD off the R3 Meta and CXA81 combo though… I’ve heard others say that the Cambridge doesn’t power they’re LS50 enough, which is rated far less than the R3. Let's have a brief look at the main features of NAD C 389 and Cambridge Audio CXA81 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. It's a huge step up and they are regularly £900 from Cambridge directly. I prefer the NAD C 316BEE by a considerable margin for few reasons; better phono stage, more powerful, sounds more robust with the Wharfedale speakers on the other end. Jan 9, 2020 · Looking to buy a new amp to replace my NAD. Comparing NAD C 368 and Cambridge Audio CXA81? Our Virginia-based experts can help you find the best gear. Thank you for watching the Video! If you enjoyed, Please hit the like and Subscribe !This video is a sound comparison between Audiolab 6000A and Cambridge Au suggested Cambridge Audio CXA80 Rega Brio NAD C 368 NAD C 328 NAD D3020 Omnitronic MP-120 Power Dynamics PDV360MP3 Fenton FPL700 TOA VM-2120 Vonyx VPA600 Follow us Popular comparisons The NAD C368 is a hybrid stereo integrated amplifier that is an excellent combination of traditional and modern NAD technologies. Cambridge Audio CXA81. Not by brand favourite. In this review, we will be comparing C 379 and CXA81, two Integrated Amplifiers from NAD and Cambridge. Between Cambridge Audio CXA81 vs CXA61, the CXA81 amplifier has a balanced XLR and 4 RCA. Sent unit back and cancelled replacement. Let's have a brief look at the main features of NAD C 379 and Cambridge Audio CXA81 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. Search. Output ranges from 80 watts to 120 watts depending on speakers. The Cambridge Audio CXA81 and Arcam SA30 are top-notch integrated amplifiers. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Cambridge CXA81 II and NAD C 389 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. If it matters, might consider some LS50 or Metas soon, or the BW 607/606 as a speaker upgrade. Other similar, but more affordable products, are Blesound POWERNODE and SVS Prime Wireless Pro SoundBase. The NAD hasn't even come out of the box yet as I'm enjoying the Cambridge so much. vs. The Cambridge AXR100 brings a mix of basic features and high-quality audio. 1 channel system. So far, it seems like the best contenders are the Marantz PM8005/8006, Cambridge CXA80 and the NAD C368. 9inch 2 vs 1594. The Cambridge Audio CXA81 Mk II is the successor to the popular CXA81, which earned rave reviews from our customers. 4 Cambridge CXA81, distortion (%) vs 1kHz continuous output power into 8 ohms. CXA81 還可以透過「控制匯流排」RCA 電纜與其他劍橋設備交換控制命令，例如 Cambridge Audio CXN V2 網路播放器。 我們對 Cambridge Audio CXA81 的結論. NAD C 368 BluOS-2i is a Streaming Integrated Amplifier speaker whereas the CXA81 is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker. Sep 26, 2016 · The NAD C 368 ticks a lot of boxes as a successful stereo amp. The difference for the couple hundred extra (vs new CXN price) is enormous NAD C 388 BluOS-2i is a Streaming Integrated Amplifier speaker whereas the CXA81 is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker. Successeur du Cambridge CXA80, il en reprend les principales qualités tout en apportant des améliorations et de nouvelles fonctions. A friend of mine is worried about the power reserve in this Nad and could it withstand a continuos 60% driving with low section heavy music. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Cambridge Audio CXA81 and NAD C 388 BluOS-2i first before getting into our more detailed comparison. The Cambridge is rated at twice the power if that is meaningful and it also connects two pair of speakers which is an important factor for me. Cambridge Audio CXA81 is an often recommended amplifier on this subreddit. Only using it as a desktop amp for computer audio (lossless audio + streaming). I would much rather get one of the Yamaha’s. The cambridge didn't open up until like 75db, low volume was poor/sounded compressed. Jun 1, 2018 · I have narrowed it down to these two: NAD C338 vs Cambridge CXA60 Speakers are Focal Dome Flax and subwoofer is Gallo TR-3D. I’ve tried the Attessa, and it is too expensive for what it is. So within the brand the levels are consistent. I found it decent for TV and films, but felt that it sucked the life out of music, so I decided to return it. It has lots of inputs for different devices. Jan 12, 2021 · The NAD C368 with the additional BluOS module comes in at around £1100 with current offer from Sevenoaks. please advise me if you have test it for yourself. Yamaha A-S801 vs Cambridge Audio CXA81 Integrated Amplifier Comparison In this review, we will be comparing A-S801 and CXA81, two Integrated Amplifiers from Yamaha and Cambridge. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Cambridge Audio CXA61 and Cambridge Audio CXA81 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. The CXA61 includes a Besides the performance specs of the Cambridge Audio CXA81, the next important feature set that you have to evaluate is the input and output selections that it offers. In case your audio sources are mostly digital, we prefer you to buy Cambridge Audio CXA81 with an additional cost. Jun 21, 2018 · Been looking at a new integrated amp around the $1000 range. You do not need to reverse your speaker connections when using this device. 106 dB vs 105 dB: Higher ratings results in cleaner sound: Bluetooth Version: v5. 2 vs v4. May 24, 2020 · If you look at the spec's of the Azure 851W power amp you see Cambridge uses a sensitivity of 1,5 V rms, the limit of the CXA81 preamp outputs. I was searching for a used CXA81 when I found a used CXA61 for $675 on eBay. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Cambridge Audio CXA81 and Rotel A14 MKII first before getting into our more detailed comparison. Cambridge Audio CXA81 - MSRP 1299$ - Compare w/ C 389; NAD C 389 supports the following Bluetooth Codecs when used with supported devices: AptX; AAC; SBC; Bluetooth Transmitter: NAD C 389 can also act as a Bluetooth transmitter, making it possible to stream the music from the amp to your bluetooth headphones or speakers. Cambridge CXA81 L'ampli-DAC Cambridge CXA81 délivre 2 x 80 watts de puissance sous 8 ohms. Feb 19, 2023 · Análisis del Cambridge CXA81: diseño. I thought the CA would be too much of a lateral move, but it does seem to be a bit of a step up. Dec 24, 2020 · Fig. Edit: Some more options - not all as well known as the above, but also great picks in my opinion: Comparing NAD C 700 and Cambridge Audio CXA81? Our Virginia-based experts can help you find the best gear. I own both the NAD and Cambridge and listen to them every single day. Nov 30, 2023 · NAD and Cambridge are two renowned and well-respected brands in the audio industry and produce high-quality speakers, soundbars, headphones, and subwoofers. Rebuilt from the ground up, the CXA81 offers several new features over its predecessor, the CXA80. I've had the 6000a and a cxa81 or 61, forgot. Cambridge Audio CXA81 is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker whereas the C 388 BluOS-2i is a Streaming Integrated Amplifier speaker. One failed within a week of purchase; the other, about 18 months in. NAD C 368 BluOS-2i. The soundstage "narrowing" appears more pronounced on the Audiolab compared to the CXA61 to me. I have had a brief experience of Cambridge Audio when I bought a CXA60. Cambridge CXA80 . In this review, we will be comparing C 389 and CXA81, two Integrated Amplifiers from NAD and Cambridge. I want to update my amplifier (currently own a rotel RA1520). Nov 27, 2019 · Cambridge Audio CXA81; NAD C368; Which one of these is warmest ? Are there any other, warmer options (without sacrificing sound quality too much and in the same price range) ? My source - Rega Planar 1, speakers - Monitor Audio Bronze 6. Jan 28, 2020 · NAD C368 - This is a lot more than I was intending to spend. As the hifi gear gets more mature, it also gets more new flavors Oct 21, 2004 · I was toying with the idea of selling the Yamaha and buying a Cambridge Audio CXA81. Feb 15, 2024 · Cambridge Audio is very neutral nad universal choice. Para ello, el Cambridge CXA81 vuelve apostar por un chasis Lunar Grey, una estructura fabricada en aluminio anodizado para ofrecer un producto que entra por los ojos. The terminals will accept Oct 12, 2022 · The CXA81 also houses a superior ESS Sabre ES9016K2M DAC and improved USB input that supports audio of up to 32-bit/384kHz and DSD256 quality, allowing you to make full use of its delightful presentation with high-resolution files, while an aptX HD Bluetooth receiver is also built in for direct streaming from any compatible device at up to 24-bit/84kHz. 80 watts per channel give CXA81 complete authority over music, to reveal every emotion and nuance from your whole music collection Comparing NAD C 338 and Cambridge Audio CXA81? Our Virginia-based experts can help you find the best gear. Features wise it seems excellent, decent DAC, phono stage. This means that this receiver is great for those who have never used a stereo receiver before, along with those who are looking for something a little better than the standard models. And only slightly less in for continuous power @4ohms (with less distortion at lower power levels). " For its price, it is great. also the Powernode or NAD C368, but it might be nice to get something with 100 watts or more. Maintaining specified distortion at 4/8Ω and at 20-20kHz is a much more difficult achievement. Near field and normal listening in a small room. 2: Higher transfer rate and range: PhonoInput: Yes vs No: Connect a turntable directly to your amp: Coaxial Digital Inputs: 2 vs 1: More options for connecting Digital sources: Base Surface Area: 1579. 5 Cambridge CXA81, distortion (%) vs 1kHz continuous output power into 4 ohms. Rotel A12. NAD uses this stricter performance criterion because it more closely matches the demands of real music and real loudspeakers. CXA61 inbuilt DAC vs DacMagic into the CXA61. Dec 24, 2020 · I recently purchased a Cambridge Audio CXA81 amplifier and consulted the engineers at Cambridge Audio regarding this issue. They might even do better QC. These amps come with cool features like streaming support and room correction. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Cambridge Audio CXA81 and NAD C 368 BluOS-2i first before getting into our more detailed comparison. Anyone have any experience with any of these models? They differ a bit in features (especially DAC's), but what I'm really looking for is which sounds the best. What do we know about the manufacturer? New Acoustic Dimension (NAD) was founded by some audio fans, manufacturers, and sound engineers in 1972, and the reason for this alliance was that they were not overly May 25, 2018 · The NAD @ 50 wpc seems ridiculously low powered for a Class D amp. I did research into integrated amps in that price range (1000-1500€). I think the main differences between the two are 60 vs 80 wpc, an XLR input on the CXA81, and a slightly better DAC chip in Same good looks, new and improved sound. You get a month to return it no questions I think. Thank you for watching Video! If you enjoyed, Please hit the like and Subscribe !This video is a sound comparison between NAD C 368 stereo Amplifier and Camb Cambridge Audio CXA81 is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker whereas the C 368 BluOS-2i is a Streaming Integrated Amplifier speaker. Mar 31, 2021 · I recently got myself the Cambridge Audio CXA81 (80W) which is in the same segment as the 8006 and when i compared it to the sound of my 6006 (45W) and Marantz SR6013 (its an AVR so does power rating really matter?) while playing electronic music, specifically new retro wave by 'the midnight', i liked both the Marantz twins better. . Or are you saying that it's not the chip as such which causes the change in sound, but how it is implemented into the DAC circuit as a whole? Comparing NAD C 3050 and Cambridge Audio CXA81? Our Virginia-based experts can help you find the best gear. My budget is 1000 up to 1300€. Seriously, this box looks like something Sonos (or for that matter Apple or even Microsoft) can hack together doing system integration if they ever wanted to do a box like this. The NAD with its Hypex UcD amplifier modules would be likely the best amplifier stage (from performance point of view). Fig. The NAD lacks bass, treble and balance controls if you care about that. I can pick up a new CXA80 for $800. Maybe a Krell Duo 300 XD? Comparing NAD C 368 and Cambridge Audio CXA80? Our Virginia-based experts can help you find the best gear. The fact that I can get this amp at the moment with a BlueOS module for less than either of the other 2 amps and a network streamer had me looking at this. Primare I15. In this review, we will be comparing two different type of speakers . But for me, it might bug me that both the NAD C 368 and Arcam SA20 are kind previous generation products compared to the newer and more capable (but more expensive) NAD C 389 (and NAD C 399), and Arcam SA30. Will keep older CXA81 which is still working. 4 days ago · Wellington Closes: Sat, 8 Feb Cambridge Audio Integrated Amplifier CXA81 Buy Now $1,700 Trademe NZ NZ$1,700 Feb 2, 2025. The new CXA81 has caught my eye and it’s just been released. Any info would be appreciated. It is compatible with four-ohm speakers up to 16 ohms total load so there are lots of options for getting the best speakers. NAD C 3050 Review: Unbiased Insights to Guide Your Apr 7, 2023 · I’m also considering used Arcam SA20 or NAD C368 as cheaper options. Jan 23, 2017 · After much of the research and budget considerations, I have narrowed down my choices to Cambridge Audio CXA80 and NAD C368. Obviously, I daresay that the CXA81 is probably a totally different beast. The lack of tight bass from a 100wpc amp kept on bothering me. Comparing NAD C 368 BluOS-2i and Cambridge Audio CXA81? Our Virginia-based experts can help you find the best gear. The benefit of NAD's Full Disclosure Power is the total elimination of audible distortion at any listening level. Yamaha AS-201 vs Cambridge Audio Azur Comparing NAD C 3050 and Cambridge Audio CXA81 Mk II? Our Virginia-based experts can help you find the best gear. NAD C 389 - MSRP 1499$ - Compare w/ C 368; Cambridge Audio CXA81 - MSRP 1299$ - Compare w/ C 368; NAD C 368 supports the following Bluetooth Codecs when used with supported devices: AptX; Bluetooth Transmitter: NAD C 368 can also act as a Bluetooth transmitter, making it possible to stream the music from the amp to your bluetooth headphones or Jun 26, 2003 · Digital inputs are must have. They both claim to be able to power "the most demanding of speakers" - which pretty much every amplifier manufacturer says about their products. It also was so new it had the stickers on. Our CXA81 integrated amplifier builds on the foundations laid by the first CX Series, and over 50 years’ experience of building amps. Some prefer the CXA61 to the CXA81, but I am sure the CXA81 is the better amplifier. Nad is my favourite for now but the module is too expensive and i need bluetooth and/or wifi network capabilities. ด้านคุณภาพ Jun 22, 2024 · The CXA81 MkII has some details that are increasingly unusual in this day and age too. If I went with a NAD, it would not be this model, there are others which I think are better. 当你通过cxa81 mk ii听到熟悉的音乐时，你首先的反应是一切听起来有多详细。你会重拾你以前错过的细节，如乐器，音调的微妙变化及和声。闭上眼睛，你就能把每一位音乐家都安排在舞台上。一旦听过cxa81 mk ii，你就不会回头了。 Find out if the Cambridge Audio CXA61 or the NAD C368 is best suited for your needs. Compare that to my 20 year old Conrad-Johnson, 10 year old NAD, 5 year old Benchmark, and 40 years of Yamaha without a single failure. Both sounded great, but their reliability, in my experience, says they're a no-go. The volume control is on a standard pot with a defined start and stop point (and something that Cambridge Audio has improved over the years is the gearing of this control which is now pleasingly linear). We've analyzed reviews from experts, Reddit, and consumers alike. But Hegel tend to be more expensive. It offers a progressive perspective – effortless, poised and sophisticated. Detailed comparison of the NAD C 368 vs Cambridge Audio CXA81 amplifiers to find out their strengths and weaknesses, and decide which one to choose. Let's have a brief look at the main features of NAD C 368 and NAD C 338 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. Cambridge Audio CXA81 is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker whereas the Evo 75 is a Streaming Integrated Amplifier speaker. Get FREE 2-day shipping and free lifetime tech support with your order. If you can listen to them both, I wouldthe dual DACs of the CXA81 are irrelevant due to the CXNV2. Audiloab 6000a vs NAD C316 BEE v2 . Hah! A one box solution that would support the switching I need but would also focus on high quality stereo sound. Want to connect another amplifier to the CXA81, say a popular NAD C298? Input sensitivity 1,43V rms so no problem. Let's have a brief look at the main features of NAD C 368 BluOS-2i and Cambridge Audio CXA81 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. A-B Speaker Terminals: The Cambridge Audio CXA81 MKii integrated amplifier is equipped with two sets of gold-plated, binding-post speaker terminals (labeled A and B). NAD C389 or C399 Yamaha A-S701/801, which is commonly the recommended go to ‘budget’ amp for these speakers (class AB). I love thick sound. Let's have a brief look at the main features of Yamaha A-S801 and Cambridge Audio CXA81 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. กระทู้คำถาม Amplifier. One is on my desktop and the other is in my bedroom system. But I also had inefficient speakers and it might have been the 61 so yeah, mileage I am currently at NAD D3045 + Dali Oberon 1 + Cambridge Audio DacMagic 100 (because the built-in NAD DAC is too shallow and lacking detail). CA is more neutral and linear sounding, NAD has more body and bass. Also that the new NAD classic series XX5 is superior to the XX2 series in that it is less warm and more detailed. To my ears, the CXA61 Mar 17, 2021 · NAD C368 or C388 (both are high-pass capable) Parasound NewClassic 200 Integrated (might be hard to find a new one, I noticed Parasound kind of disappeared from various online retailers-wondering if this is due to production problems and the pandemic)(also has high-pass) Nov 12, 2022 · Cambridge AXR100 Cambridge Audio AXR100. Cambridge Audio CXA81 的優點在於其廣泛的類比和數位輸入，以及扣人心弦、動態引人入勝且細節豐富的聲音。 In this review, we will be comparing two different type of speakers by Cambridge. . The prior version was the CXA80. Any advice gratefully received Dec 24, 2020 · The Cambridge Audio/Polk tag team had me at the needle drop. Tags: cambridge audio cxa61 marantz pm6007 versus. Choosing between NAD and Cambridge Audio amplifiers is a matter of individual preferences and the specific requirements of your audio system. Let's have a brief look at the main features of NAD C 388 BluOS-2i and Cambridge Audio CXA81 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. Let's have a brief look at the main features of NAD C 388 and Cambridge Audio CXA81 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. Cambridge Audio CXA81 has total of 5 Analog inputs . Cambridge Audio CXA81 Mk II is a Integrated Amplifier speaker whereas the CXA81 is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker. They are perfect for those who love great sound and modern tech. It’s not only well-connected but has a pleasantly smooth, refined and muscle-bound sound that’s very agreeable indeed – even if by being a touch safe-sounding, it’s leapfrogged by more complete rivals before it’s even had the chance to touch its toes. Jan 8, 2023 · Always looking for ways to simplify, I almost bought an NAD C368 or C388 several months ago because they support MDC modules, one of which includes HDMI inputs and switching. But generally speaking both of them are relatively warm sounding compared to other brands like yamaha etc. It is a sweet spot to have a mature device in HIFI that brings you closer to that true audiophile HIFI experience. Afraid of getting replacement unit--lack of quality control at Cambridge? Have owned several cambridge amps and cd players over the years. Dec 21, 2016 · By the way, i just had a look on the Richersounds website and the CXA60 is now cheaper, but the CXA80 is similar in power output to the NAD C368 and both got 4 star review along with the Pioneer A50DA - Cambridge amp still cheaper than the NAD. Aug 25, 2014 · I actually bought a NAD C316BEE v2 at the same time as I couldn't decide which way to go and at £300 each way I could afford to hedge my bets. Similar specs, though reviews and the website swear they redesigned part of the preamp section. A audiolab 6000a and a nad c368, pretty sure the 316 is similar enough sonically. I suspect the CXA81 has a lot of extra digital bells and whistles which detracts from the overall sound experience. I want your opinion about two amplifiers that i have in mind, Rotel A14 and Primare i15 and Cambridge cxa81 Music preference rock, metal, electronic Sep 16, 2021 · Excellent question. $1,199. Grâce à son DAC ESS Sabre ES9016 K2M intégré, il est désormais compatible 32 bits/384 kHz et DSD 256. suggested Cambridge Audio CXA60 NAD C 368 NAD C 375BEE NAD C 390DD Hegel H190 Omnitronic MP-120 Power Dynamics PDV360MP3 Fenton FPL700 TOA VM-2120 Vonyx VPA600 เปรียบเทียบแอมป์ฯ NAD C368 vs Cambridge Audio CXA81. Audiolab inbuilt DAC vs DacMagic into the Audiolab. It sounds so good with my Revel M16's. The NAD is said to have a tiny, cramped remote where the CAs is full size if not a tiny bit odd with its layout. This is solide not too expensive and universal choice. I’m looking at either a Sonos Amp or the NAD C368 to drive my Q150. I also considered the CXA81 as well. ===== Thank you for contacting Cambridge Audio. It was kindly drop shipped by a member and costs US $1,199. Let's have a brief look at the main features of NAD C 368 and Cambridge Audio CXA61 first before getting into our more detailed comparison. But it is important that the CXA60 sounds different to the CXA80. I've had both brands in my house. To replace it, I am currently alternating between a CXA81, as it pairs nicely with the CXA v2, or the Yamaha AS801 or 1200. Total Number of Analog Inputs: 5 I have a CXA61, I love it. 模块化设计结构（MDC），使您可以在现在或将来为您的NAD功放定制额外的功能和特性。BluOS 两个可用的MDC插槽可以容纳各种升级模块，包括4K视频功能的HDMI切换，额外的数字输入，额外的模拟和唱机输入，以及最先进的Hi-Res Audio多房间无线系统之一，由Bluesound 开发的音乐管理系统。 Comparing NAD C 389 and Cambridge Audio CXA81? Our Virginia-based experts can help you find the best gear. There are no visible changes from the original CXA81 I tested. (Could be that this subreddit is more USA focused, and Arcam brand isn’t that popular there. 67V, which is equivalent to 20W into 8 ohms and 40W into 4 ohms. I've purchased two Cambridge products. (Note that, NAD C 700 and both the Bluesound and SVS products are smaller all-in-one products that have Sep 8, 2024 · This is a review and detailed measurements of the Cambridge CXA81 MKII integrated stereo amplifier with digital inputs (USB, Toslink, Coax) and Bluetooth. I've never used Cambridge but have some experience with NAD. The CXA80’s desirability is further bolstered by its classy, modern design and fine build quality. The new Cambridge Audio CXA81 Mk II, as it is called, may not be an entire redesign or reimagining, keeping to the exact same dimensions and minimal aesthetic as its predecessor, just as the recently launched Cambridge Audio CXN100 music streamer stuck to the same design as the preceding, multi-Award-winning CXN Aug 26, 2022 · Cambridge Audio CXA81 Review Cambridge Audio CXA81. Comparing NAD C 388 and Cambridge Audio CXA81? Our Virginia-based experts can help you find the best gear. Aug 25, 2021 · Cambridge Audio CXA61 vs CXA81. Cost is similar when looking at the NAD refurb. Speakers Kef R300. 2inch 2: takes Comparing Arcam A15 and Cambridge Audio CXA81? Our Virginia-based experts can help you find the best gear. The NAD has a different presentation than Cambridge. Currently the CXA81 is going at full price only for $1300. In this review, we will be comparing CXA61 and CXA81, two Integrated Amplifiers by Cambridge. And there's also Emotiva which are known for excellent value, as they sell online direct: Emotiva BasX TA2. NAD C 368 vs Cambridge Audio CXA61 Integrated Amplifier Comparison In this review, we will be comparing C 368 and CXA61, two Integrated Amplifiers from NAD and Cambridge. Set up is in an office. The CXA81 was out of my budget when shopping but is an upgrade but the question is whether the additional power is worth it. I have had a NAD amplifier go bad after a few years of use and getting it fixed was not fun. The Cambridge Audio CXA81 packs 80 watts per channel into 8 ohms. I preferred the 6000a. Oct 19, 2020 · Just to throw it in the mix, but if you do decide to go amp plus cambridge streamer, look on ebay at Cambridge 'refurbs' for the big brother to the CXN, the 851N. I own a Class D amp from another manufacturer and am happy with it, so not a Class D hater. There's the Cambridge CXA81 at a £1000. See all our NAD reviews Comparing NAD C 338 and Cambridge Audio CXA81 Mk II? Our Virginia-based experts can help you find the best gear. Combination with Dali is no problem. Sorry for lame english. What is better to choose Cambridge CXA81 or Cambridge CXA80 ? Videos, photos and reviews on E-Catalog NAD C368. Cambridge Audio CXA81 vs Rotel A14 MKII Integrated Amplifier Comparison In this review, we will be comparing CXA81 and A14 MKII, two Integrated Amplifiers from Cambridge and Rotel. 7cm 2 / 247. Better soundstaging and detail, all around just more mature sound. But this is my opinion. NAD C368 BluOS Integrated Amplifier SALE PRICE Cambridge Audio CXA81 MkII Integrated Amplifier . Have I got this right? That seems to define NAD these days. 8cm 2 / 244. Sep 19, 2023 · Got a chance to hear the rotel s14 with SF lumina V, straight out of the box very pleasing, easy on the ear sound. Hello, now i have monitor audio bronze 6 with cambridge axr100 for my room( 4m x 7m). Nov 15, 2016 · 2017 NAD C368 Integrated Amplifier with DAC, BRAND NEW FACTORY SEALED Features 80 watts x 2 channels into 8 or 4 ohms (20-20,000 Hz) at 0. Sep 18, 2020 · solidity. 00 In about the same price range as the CXA81, is NAD C 700. 03% THD4-ohm stable for use with a wide range of speakers built-in Bluetooth for wireless music streaming from a compatible device or wireless headphone listening supports the aptX codec for wirelessly streaming CD-quality sound independent built-in high NAD C368 BluOS Integrated Amplifier SALE PRICE Add to cart. Heos I do not like. I have owned the cxa80 for a good year before switching to the nad c368 and somehow never in that time with cambridge I felt like the sound was what I had liked. They confidently denied the occurrence of polarity inversion when using data input at that time. May 28, 2020 · According to Cambridge Audio, the second generation CX Series has been re-engineered to bring “full-fat” hi-fi into the home at an “affordable” price (the CXA81 is most expensive product in the range). Oct 17, 2019 · System 2: Cambridge Audio CXA81, Cambridge Audio CXN100, Dali Opticon 6, Monitor Audio GR20, Rega Ela Mk1 Cinema: Denon AVR3200W, Pearlisten R7T, MA GRFX, MA GR Centre, 2x Monolith V2 12" ptd subs, 130" HiVilux screen, BenQ W2700 Outputs: The Cambridge Audio CXA81 MKii integrated amp is outfitted with A-B speaker terminals, a mono-sub output, stereo pre-outs and a headphone jack. Cambridge Audio CXA81 Mk II is a Integrated Amplifier speaker whereas the C 389 is a Integrated Amplifier with built-in DAC speaker. In this article, we will cover a general overview of both brands, looking specifically at the sound quality, durability, price, and so on. Or some small Hegel amp. If you want to buy the NAD, buy it used, it is Jul 8, 2024 · Big, Bold and Best in Class! Music Fidelity M3si Amp Review (vs Cambridge Audio CXA81, Denon, Arcam)I think around 1000 to 1500 is a great range to buy HIFI equipment. It was pretty good at higher db though. In this review, we will be comparing two different type of speakers by Cambridge. ARX00 v CXA81 upvote NAD C368 vs Cambridge Audio CXA81 upvotes They have a Cambridge CXA81, but I feel like I won’t be be able to push the R3’s as far as they can go. The NAD has integrated network player functions via BluOS. Dec 25, 2020 · It was quite good for the price but a little rough around the edges, a little flabby in the bass and lacking definition compared to the NAD it replaced. Jan 24, 2010 · What I have heard from a couple of dealers who sell both is that the NAD is more dynamic and the Cambridge is warmer/smooth/more polite sounding than the NAD. Warm sound profile seem to match what I listen to and hence these two choices. Streaming from computer to amp did not work. Nothing he suggested would get the amp to produce sound. I want to upgrade it between nad c388 or cambridge cxa81. crfcigk qoys rvy xhyvel awsx tyuk kldh ezil pwkdlhgb loah qlam yujty mflivn xvrp erly